Accidently stepped on the gas in neutral
#1
Accidently stepped on the gas in neutral
Hello all. This is my first post. This past December, I got a 1971 Coupe with a 496 Stroker, Solid Roller Lifter Cam, .700" lift, TH400 automatic with a Hurst Quarter Stick, and 5:13 gears. I have taken it out about 5 times since this brutal winter here in NY. Getting used to the car, really enjoying it. Anyhow, after going for a long drive, I was getting ready to move it into the garage and I was about to put the shifter into reverse from neutral but instead of putting my clumsy big foot on the brake, I floored the accelerator. The engine roared and before I could get my foot off the gas and check the tach, within two seconds, the rev limiter cut off the engine completely. I don't think I even got to redline but I am not 100 percent sure. After a minute, I restarted the engine and took it for a ten minute drive; everything seemed okay.
I can't shake the concern that I might have done some damage. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks.
Paul
I can't shake the concern that I might have done some damage. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks.
Paul
#3
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Posts: 39,566
Received 548 Likes
on
375 Posts
I know it's a matter of personal choice, but 5.13:1 gears is, to me, pretty restrictive. My 68 ZZ4 had a 3.73:1 (?) rear end and it drove on the freeway at about 3000 rpm at 60 mph. I installed a Tremac TKO 600 trannie and now cruises at 2000 rpm at 70 mph. 3000 rpm at 60 mph just drove me nuts..just me.
My 1970 project car also has a 3.73:1 rear end ratio..all Tom's Differential stuff. It'll have a 496 pr 502 cubic inch engine. It's a Keith Black aluminum block and aluminum Brodix heads. It now had a TKO 600 trannie also. Should be looking at 2000 rpm at 70 mph also.
Back to your 5.13:1 rear end. A stone stock Corvette C3 IRS cannot tolerate more than about 550 hp with the stock tires, even racing tires, that were available in the early 1970's. This is 550 HP that the L88 engines developed for road racing with road racing tires. 550 hp with drag racing tires will destroy the rear end differential as I understand it, If you really have a lot of HP, and a 5.13:1 rear end, you could well be reaching the limitations of the rear end. Check out Tom's Differentials. Enjoy!!
My 1970 project car also has a 3.73:1 rear end ratio..all Tom's Differential stuff. It'll have a 496 pr 502 cubic inch engine. It's a Keith Black aluminum block and aluminum Brodix heads. It now had a TKO 600 trannie also. Should be looking at 2000 rpm at 70 mph also.
Back to your 5.13:1 rear end. A stone stock Corvette C3 IRS cannot tolerate more than about 550 hp with the stock tires, even racing tires, that were available in the early 1970's. This is 550 HP that the L88 engines developed for road racing with road racing tires. 550 hp with drag racing tires will destroy the rear end differential as I understand it, If you really have a lot of HP, and a 5.13:1 rear end, you could well be reaching the limitations of the rear end. Check out Tom's Differentials. Enjoy!!
Last edited by 68/70Vette; 04-08-2014 at 10:54 PM.
#9
Safety Car
with that engine specs and those gears, i expect that your car has seen alot more exercise than you have given it.. i bet it has been well past the red line alot.. by the way, how do you know what the redline is?
#11
You're probably right. I think it has seen alot more exercise and RPM's than I have yet to give it. I am not clear on what determines redline on a particular engine. The engine was rebuilt on March 29, 2013 and I have the dyno sheet. Peak Torque is 623.97@4700 RPM and Peak HP is 655.11@6100 RPM. From what I can gather, redline takes into account bore and stroke, rod/stroke ratio or whatever is a little passed (+500 RPM) peak HP RPM. Maybe someone here knows of a concrete formula for redline.
#12
Race Director
I know it's a matter of personal choice, but 5.13:1 gears is, to me, pretty restrictive. My 68 ZZ4 had a 3.73:1 (?) rear end and it drove on the freeway at about 3000 rpm at 60 mph. I installed a Tremac TKO 600 trannie and now cruises at 2000 rpm at 70 mph. 3000 rpm at 60 mph just drove me nuts..just me.
My 1970 project car also has a 3.73:1 rear end ratio..all Tom's Differential stuff. It'll have a 496 pr 502 cubic inch engine. It's a Keith Black aluminum block and aluminum Brodix heads. It now had a TKO 600 trannie also. Should be looking at 2000 rpm at 70 mph also.
Back to your 5.13:1 rear end. A stone stock Corvette C3 IRS cannot tolerate more than about 550 hp with the stock tires, even racing tires, that were available in the early 1970's. This is 550 HP that the L88 engines developed for road racing with road racing tires. 550 hp with drag racing tires will destroy the rear end differential as I understand it, If you really have a lot of HP, and a 5.13:1 rear end, you could well be reaching the limitations of the rear end. Check out Tom's Differentials. Enjoy!!
My 1970 project car also has a 3.73:1 rear end ratio..all Tom's Differential stuff. It'll have a 496 pr 502 cubic inch engine. It's a Keith Black aluminum block and aluminum Brodix heads. It now had a TKO 600 trannie also. Should be looking at 2000 rpm at 70 mph also.
Back to your 5.13:1 rear end. A stone stock Corvette C3 IRS cannot tolerate more than about 550 hp with the stock tires, even racing tires, that were available in the early 1970's. This is 550 HP that the L88 engines developed for road racing with road racing tires. 550 hp with drag racing tires will destroy the rear end differential as I understand it, If you really have a lot of HP, and a 5.13:1 rear end, you could well be reaching the limitations of the rear end. Check out Tom's Differentials. Enjoy!!
#13
Terrorizing Orange Cones
Were you wearing steel-toed engineer or hiking or motorcycle boots?
If your foot doesn't quickly learn the difference between stepping on the brake vs the throttle, you may end up hurting reciprocating parts in that 496 if the problem continues. I'm guessing, your event was a one-time and rare occurrence, correct?
I agree with the others: no harm, no foul. I'll guess that the motor is fine.
Stout package installed in your car. Is it licensed for the street or strictly a racer?
If your foot doesn't quickly learn the difference between stepping on the brake vs the throttle, you may end up hurting reciprocating parts in that 496 if the problem continues. I'm guessing, your event was a one-time and rare occurrence, correct?
I agree with the others: no harm, no foul. I'll guess that the motor is fine.
Stout package installed in your car. Is it licensed for the street or strictly a racer?
#14
Were you wearing steel-toed engineer or hiking or motorcycle boots?
If your foot doesn't quickly learn the difference between stepping on the brake vs the throttle, you may end up hurting reciprocating parts in that 496 if the problem continues. I'm guessing, your event was a one-time and rare occurrence, correct?
I agree with the others: no harm, no foul. I'll guess that the motor is fine.
Stout package installed in your car. Is it licensed for the street or strictly a racer?
If your foot doesn't quickly learn the difference between stepping on the brake vs the throttle, you may end up hurting reciprocating parts in that 496 if the problem continues. I'm guessing, your event was a one-time and rare occurrence, correct?
I agree with the others: no harm, no foul. I'll guess that the motor is fine.
Stout package installed in your car. Is it licensed for the street or strictly a racer?
#15
Melting Slicks
Wow, someone built a monster. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that rev limiter was set up as a safe guard. If he blew a drive line part while getting on it, the rev limiter protects the engine.
Curious, what possessed you to acquire this beast? I mean nothing negative, it's just not a car for everyone.
Curious, what possessed you to acquire this beast? I mean nothing negative, it's just not a car for everyone.
#16
Wow, someone built a monster. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that rev limiter was set up as a safe guard. If he blew a drive line part while getting on it, the rev limiter protects the engine.
Curious, what possessed you to acquire this beast? I mean nothing negative, it's just not a car for everyone.
Curious, what possessed you to acquire this beast? I mean nothing negative, it's just not a car for everyone.
#17
Race Director
You go 60 MPH on the parkway with 5:13 gears. How high is the RPM's.
I had a Firebird with those gears and used to cruise about 40 on the parkway at around 3000 RPM.
I had a Firebird with those gears and used to cruise about 40 on the parkway at around 3000 RPM.
#18
#19
With that build, the rev limiter is probably set well below what it can tolerate. Your "redline" doesn't have much to do with peak horsepower. It's going to be defined by mechanical failure or valve float. Assuming that's a really stout build, it's probably valve float. Around 7000 RPM would be my best shot in the dark for a solid roller.