What are the known issues with the C3
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: MA
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are the known issues with the C3
I know that every car has its faults or trouble area's and I'm just wondering what are the corvette C3's?
I do already know of two something to do with switching over to stainless steel roters for the brakes and the parking brake:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c3-g...andalized.html
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/at-the...ing-brake-kit/
possibily three with the seats (read something about how the 1978 - 1982 seats were supposedly more comfortable)
but what else did I miss?
and also when it comes to the engine note of the C3 is there any difference between an early C3 with a 350 V8 or a latter model one made in the late 70's early 80's with the 350? and how much of a difference would the kind carb make to the engine note, like say a 4 barrel Holly double pumper vs a rochester 2 barrel?
I do already know of two something to do with switching over to stainless steel roters for the brakes and the parking brake:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c3-g...andalized.html
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/at-the...ing-brake-kit/
possibily three with the seats (read something about how the 1978 - 1982 seats were supposedly more comfortable)
but what else did I miss?
and also when it comes to the engine note of the C3 is there any difference between an early C3 with a 350 V8 or a latter model one made in the late 70's early 80's with the 350? and how much of a difference would the kind carb make to the engine note, like say a 4 barrel Holly double pumper vs a rochester 2 barrel?
Last edited by Kavinsky; 09-20-2011 at 01:39 AM.
#2
Safety Car
stainless steel roters
like say a 4 barrel Holly double pumper vs a Rochester 2 barrel
Because this list could be 100 pages long comparing parts.
Last edited by Tim H; 09-20-2011 at 07:22 AM.
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,470 Likes
on
1,249 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Start here. Do your homework.
This is good if you can find a copy of it at a reasonable price. It's out of print.
Purchase three or four of the Corvette history coffee table books. All of them will you about the Corvette.
This is good if you can find a copy of it at a reasonable price. It's out of print.
Purchase three or four of the Corvette history coffee table books. All of them will you about the Corvette.
#4
Pro
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Cooksville Maryland
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
DC Area Events Coordinator
I have 4 good books. Big, glossy pictures and a 1-2 page history of the cars. A LOT OF FUN knowing the different options and why each year is good AND bad. Not sure that there is any one year that you can say stay-away-from. Any part can be replaced with new in the C3 series although the early ones are getting a bit tough. And there are a lot of good friends here that can help.
#7
Exactly how far away time wise are you from buying a C3?
#8
Define 'issue'.
If you mean 'engineering faults that make it prone to having problems', that'll vary by year. T-tops like to leak though, and it's damn near impossible getting the windows aligned to them.
Also the rear windows on many of them leak.
The doors often had uneven spaces, and if the hood shuts evenly it's a fault by NCRS standards because stock that NEVER happens.
But overall they were well designed cars!
If you mean - what don't people LIKE about them.. Power I suppose. Lack of storage - particularly in the pre 78. Many years (pre 78 again) had small gas tanks and thus limited ranges. The 1975 was underpowered. The 1973-1981 had slightly less power than the 1971 and 1972, and the 1971-1972 had slightly less power than the pre-unleaded versions.
As for power.. The leaded cars got right around 220 net HP, the 1971-1972 got 200 net HP (as did the 1982), the 1973-1974 and the 1980-1981 got 190 HP, the 1975 got 160 HP, the 1976-1977 got 180 HP, the 1978 got 185 HP, and the 1979 got 195 HP.
Change the exhaust on any of them (to true duals without cats) and maybe tweak the air intake and they all get right around 220 HP. Torque will be at 300 base - roughly following HP up or down through the years.
If you mean 'engineering faults that make it prone to having problems', that'll vary by year. T-tops like to leak though, and it's damn near impossible getting the windows aligned to them.
Also the rear windows on many of them leak.
The doors often had uneven spaces, and if the hood shuts evenly it's a fault by NCRS standards because stock that NEVER happens.
But overall they were well designed cars!
If you mean - what don't people LIKE about them.. Power I suppose. Lack of storage - particularly in the pre 78. Many years (pre 78 again) had small gas tanks and thus limited ranges. The 1975 was underpowered. The 1973-1981 had slightly less power than the 1971 and 1972, and the 1971-1972 had slightly less power than the pre-unleaded versions.
As for power.. The leaded cars got right around 220 net HP, the 1971-1972 got 200 net HP (as did the 1982), the 1973-1974 and the 1980-1981 got 190 HP, the 1975 got 160 HP, the 1976-1977 got 180 HP, the 1978 got 185 HP, and the 1979 got 195 HP.
Change the exhaust on any of them (to true duals without cats) and maybe tweak the air intake and they all get right around 220 HP. Torque will be at 300 base - roughly following HP up or down through the years.
#9
Base models that is...
As for carbs - you might get better overall performance from a different carb, but you won't get more wide-open power. Really the Quadrajet is a good match for the engine.
As for carbs - you might get better overall performance from a different carb, but you won't get more wide-open power. Really the Quadrajet is a good match for the engine.
#10
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes
on
2,515 Posts
Hi K,
Since I'm familiar with the earlier cars, (68-72), I'll speak to the 'issues' with those.
The mechanical/ running gear/chassis areas of the cars were VERY dependable, and still are.
The frames began to rust and cause trouble as the cars aged, but certainly not on all cars.
The birdcage began to rust too because the cars definitely had water leak problems since new. But again, not all cars have birdcage rust.
What 'issues' a car may have now depends on how it was maintained, and if modified, how well the modifications were done.
Every car needs to be assessed on it's own merits.
Regards,
Alan
We're usually not such a 'tough' audience!
Since I'm familiar with the earlier cars, (68-72), I'll speak to the 'issues' with those.
The mechanical/ running gear/chassis areas of the cars were VERY dependable, and still are.
The frames began to rust and cause trouble as the cars aged, but certainly not on all cars.
The birdcage began to rust too because the cars definitely had water leak problems since new. But again, not all cars have birdcage rust.
What 'issues' a car may have now depends on how it was maintained, and if modified, how well the modifications were done.
Every car needs to be assessed on it's own merits.
Regards,
Alan
We're usually not such a 'tough' audience!
Last edited by Alan 71; 09-20-2011 at 02:13 PM.
#13
Drifting
#14
Pro
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Cooksville Maryland
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
DC Area Events Coordinator
And of course everyone is leaving out the 82. Hmmm.... The 82 with true duals puts out 200+ HP WITH the added benefit of Fuel Injection! It is the last of the Maco-Shark look & feel. The last of an era of the longest production model in the Corvette line, and IMHO, the best looking C series out of all of them. (Be kind to me) I do love the cross-fire.
#17
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,470 Likes
on
1,249 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
#19
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,470 Likes
on
1,249 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
#20
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,075
Received 6,980 Likes
on
4,800 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
for one the newest one is 29 years old and the oldest one is 43 years old. the car is old and wore out.