Go Back   Corvette Forum > C3 Corvettes, 1968 - 1982 > C3 General
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Albums Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ
Search
C3 General
General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech Sponsored by
Corvette America

Welcome to Corvetteforum.com!
Welcome to Corvetteforum.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Corvetteforum.com today!


Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
  
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2011, 03:20 PM   #41
GD70
CF Senior Member
 
GD70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Peekskill NY
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solid LT1 View Post
Because you don't have to bend over and vasoline up to purchase replacement front grilles

If there had been a 69 LT-1 option, that is the Vette I would own. Since there isn't I'll stick with my 70 and 72 Vettes.
The LT-1 option was available as a Dealer installed option.
My friend has a 69 L-46, that has the LT-1 options. All components dated very early 1970.

One was featured in a magazine article, but was not running properly.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
GD70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 04:27 PM   #42
Secret Squirrel
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Secret Squirrel's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Melbourne Australia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joewill View Post
They made bunches and bunches of 69's. Of course that does not mean anything either. look at the 69 camaro, they made a quarter million of them and the camaros get higher and higher prices. but everybody loves a 69.

looking at that c3 prices thread, looks like the 70 finally overtook the 69.


Click the image to open in full size.
Secret Squirrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 01:27 AM   #43
Yankeededandy
CF Senior Member

 
Yankeededandy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Hünenberg Switzerland
Default

Even Bo Derek knew in 1969, that this would be the best year for Corvettes and Camaros

Martin
Yankeededandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 11:21 AM   #44
Easy Mike
CF Senior Member
Cruise-In II Veteran
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 427basketcase View Post
...1969 also had the most engine options of any Corvette ever produced...
By 1, I suppose. The 69 engine line up was a direct carry over from the 68 model year. The only difference was the change from the 327 to the 350 for the small blocks.

The ZL-1 was the joker and there were only two of those.

Easy Mike is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 07:29 PM   #45
RagTop69
CF Senior Member
 
RagTop69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Fremont CA
Default

I realize magazine racing is relatively non-productive and that these cars were running bias ply tires, but did you look at those e.t.s and trap speeds in the article above? Not exactly smokin. My 69 Mustang 302 convertible, pastel yellow with a luggage rack, has run a best 14.308 @ 99.1 mph. Bring on them Vettes! Actually, I've got a magazine article from 1969 that showsw my Vette's drive line combo (L36, 427/390hp, 4 speed, 3.36 gears) turning a 15.02 @ 92 mph. Again, not striking fear into anyone's heart. But, back in the day, that wasn't bad.

BTW, the 69s are the best because buyers have voted them best with their money. End of argument.
RagTop69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 09:10 PM   #46
BPHORSEGUY
CF Senior Member
 
BPHORSEGUY's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2010
Location: SUFFIELD CT
Default

Best can be many different things, most power, best handling, best looking, most collectable, best investment, most historic, most memorable, most moving. The answer would be a different year in many cases. My '77 does it for me because it was the last year of the fins and flat rear window and it was built in 1976, the year I graduated and the Bicentennial. Thats all the history that matters to me and I wrote the check! It also rides better and handles better then any chrome bumper car I've ever driven and mine is no garage or trailer queen its driven almost daily from April till December. '69 does have a great song written about it though! Bottom line I love all C3's.
BPHORSEGUY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 09:23 PM   #47
66L36Coupe
CF Senior Member

 
66L36Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle WA
Send a message via AIM to 66L36Coupe Send a message via Yahoo to 66L36Coupe
Default

I've owned a Monaco Orange L46 '69 coupe, and a currently own a Bridgehampton Blue '70 small block coupe.

I still think the '69 is the purest expression of what the Stingray was supposed to be; clean and simple lines, the most SHP engine choices and more refined build quality over '68.

As mentioned earlier in this thread, if the factory would have offered the LT-1 in '69, it'd have been a killer combo.
66L36Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 10:39 PM   #48
AeroDog
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AeroDog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Charlotte NC
facebook.com/jerre.hill
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tompugh View Post
Why, why, why? discuss...
As the owner of a 68, I'd say the 69/70 is a better car. They stiffened the chassis and used bigger wheel bearings after 68. I like the flares on the 70.
AeroDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 12:39 AM   #49
Vettebuyer5869
Moderator

 
Vettebuyer5869's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from home. (The World Champs)
Default

68-72 are clustered together pretty well. Not a ton of choice between them.

Personally, I went for the 68-69 because I think the gills are that much better looking than the egg crates. The car really does look like a fish, and the gills are much more in line with that styling. I do prefer the flares of the 70-72, and the seats are a hair better, although the headrests are essentially the same function as the highback 70-78.

I also preferred the 68-69 because they were the last ones that came in black.

I would have taken a 68, but the 69 is just a bit more sorted out. So much of this is taste and subjectivity, but thats why I bought the 69.
Vettebuyer5869 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 03:47 AM   #50
WESCH
CF Senior Member
 
WESCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Europe , Luxembourg
Default

Hi

Regards,
Alan

Please make believe this is a 69.



Alain, could also be a 68, the side mirror seems far fwd, like on early 68.

Rgds. Günther
WESCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 08:29 AM   #51
early shark
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Nevada City California
Default

It's not often that the newer models get improved materials in their making over the older models, but in the corvette model this was the case. Although I like the '68, '69 Corvette style very much, my preference is for the '70 thru '72 models with '71 being my favorite...why?

The materials used in their construction and styling changes. I prefer the cast metal front grilles over plastic, also the metal rocker mouldings over fiberglass, the metal side marker housings over plastic. I also prefer the restyled seats, center console and dash and door panels.

I think the flared wheel wells are more manly and the squared exhaust styling more aggressive in appearance.
early shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 01:13 PM   #52
C3 Stroker
CF Senior Member

 
C3 Stroker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Youngstown Ohio
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vettebuyer5869 View Post
Personally, I went for the 68-69 because I think the gills are that much better looking than the egg crates......car really does look like a fish, and the gills are much more in line with that styling........
The gills were so well liked, they were copied by Plymouth's 'Cuda (also a "fish" car) in 1971.....

Click the image to open in full size.
C3 Stroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 01:21 PM   #53
Roma
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!

 
Roma's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Europe, Germany
Frank Romanowsky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faster Rat View Post
The last year for the legendary 427. Also the only year for side exhaust and it was quickly cut short due to complaints. 1970 marked the beginning of the end for muscle cars in general. Sure, there were exceptions...but the direction was clear.

Besides, 1969 just sounds so much earlier than 1970...you know, back in "the sixties"
Same as I think
Roma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 01:31 PM   #54
69FASTFUN
CF Senior Member
 
69FASTFUN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Default

As a owner of a 69 I bought it because of the side exhaust and the 427/435 BUT I do like the 72's the best I think a lot of times the last of a model year is far more refined then the 1st production cars. As far as horsepower you can always add more. The 72's would be perfect if it had the 69 side gills
69FASTFUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 02:20 PM   #55
BB72
CF Senior Member
 
BB72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Kingston Ontario
Default

I have a 72, I still beleive the last corvette was made in 67. Just can't afford one.
BB72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 02:56 PM   #56
jrubicon
CF Senior Member
 
jrubicon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: charlotte n.c.
Default

1969 is only c3 available with factory side pipes and only c3 with side gills with factory silver inserts. Last year for 427 engine. I love the side gills with silver inserts. Lots of improvements over the 1968, and 1968 did not have factory side pipes or silver gill inserts.I do however love all corvettes.
jrubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 06:30 PM   #57
427SIXPACK
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
427SIXPACK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND
Default

[/FONT]
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompugh View Post
Why, why, why? discuss...
It's NOT........ 68.... is ...
__________________

...
.........
ZIXXX PACKER
427SIXPACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 07:44 PM   #58
Solid LT1
CF Senior Member
 
Solid LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Fremont CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GD70 View Post
The LT-1 option was available as a Dealer installed option.
My friend has a 69 L-46, that has the LT-1 options. All components dated very early 1970.

One was featured in a magazine article, but was not running properly.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
That dealer built 69 LT-1 shure was a slow SLUG compared to the one Car Life tested in the 1970 model year. The 70 model went 102MPH in the 1/4 mile where the "69" dealer modified car only went 99MPH. I'm thinking it was running a std points ignition rather than the K-66 that was amnditory on the 70-71 LT-1 Vettes.

Call it what you want, there were NO 69 LT-1 Vettes in my book, they couldn't spare the intakes from Z/28 production and now with more than 20,000 extra Z/28 clones, building a 69 LT-1 clone won't be easy either. Not having a 6500RPM redline on the tach and no screw in rocker studs makes it not desirable to a guy like me who appreciates the evolution of the species. Chevy spent extra $$$ on the 70 and up LT-1 motors after too many warranty claims on the 67-69 Z/28 motors as they spit valvetrain parts out at high RPM. The screw in studs and guide plates were invented by one of my heros Smokey Yunick for race applications and no dealer conversion would ever have these details performed during a conversion.

I'n reading that article I think th eowner of that Vette was something of a WHIMP and should have stuck with the 350HP motor as he didn't want to motor wound out during testing. I care for my Vettes but I also use them to their full potential just like Zora would want me to do
Solid LT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 08:01 PM   #59
81pilot
CF Senior Member

 
81pilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Enid Oklahoma
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tompugh View Post
Why, why, why? discuss...
Performance not withstanding I like the late c3's MUCH better than the early ones. To each his (or her) own. Taste is relative and subjective.
81pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 08:15 PM   #60
C3bdj1
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '10
Support Corvetteforum!
 
C3bdj1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Nashville Tennessee
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toolman1981 View Post
Why is the '69 considered the best year of the C3s?



Simple answer......Its not!

All years of C-3s have their appeal.

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, and I personally don't care if you prefer blonds, brunettes, or redheads.





Beat me to it...


It's Not.


Bobby
C3bdj1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 08:15 PM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > C3 Corvettes, 1968 - 1982 > C3 General
Reload this Page Why is the '69 considered the best year of the C3s?
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
1969, 1972, 69, c2, c3, corvette, dealer, gills, modeled, modified, options, stingray, vettes, year, years


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Emails & Password Backup

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2