C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1970 454/390 Hp Vs 1972 454/270 Hp

Old 06-14-2008, 11:46 AM
  #1  
NMT1957
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
NMT1957's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Jefferson Hills PA
Posts: 993
Received 44 Likes on 34 Posts

Default 1970 454/390 Hp Vs 1972 454/270 Hp

What is the reason for the drop in horsepower from 1970 vs 1972 Big block? Was it just the different way of rating Horsepower or was it due to the compression difference? Or were there other factors as well?
Old 06-14-2008, 01:46 PM
  #2  
AzMotorhead
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzMotorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Peoria Az
Posts: 5,244
Received 97 Likes on 68 Posts

Default

Drop in compression was one reason. Prior to 71 HP ratings were in gross HP.After 70 all HP ratings were in net HP.
Old 06-14-2008, 02:13 PM
  #3  
HamadUP
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
HamadUP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

combination of both, in '71 the HP was 365 gross, 25 HP less than the '70s 390 gross, due to lower compression (from 10 to 8.5), and in '70 the the same gross 365 HP was converted to 270 HP, but technically, they are the same engines, well, still there are some people that they will say in '71 it was 285 net due to a better cylinder head flow.
Old 06-14-2008, 04:53 PM
  #4  
Ironcross
Race Director
 
Ironcross's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Taylor Michigan
Posts: 12,142
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Because the 454`s are actually smog engines and they started in 1970 reducing HP available in the 70 BB Vettes. In 1972, it was actually worse to finally where the BB`s were dropped completely except for over the counter off road LS7 454`s. That particular engine was sup post to have been available for the 70 model run. It never happened. The exception was a one year high HP LS6 454 but only available in a Chevelle. Fuel, omissions, and foreign oil {Arabs} screwed the 70`s right up. And the GD "greenies' are still at it today..
Old 06-14-2008, 05:00 PM
  #5  
xCCTer
CF JASOC Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
xCCTer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Downtown Annapolis, MD. The Future is where we all have to live. Let's not screw it up.
Posts: 8,040
Received 32 Likes on 18 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by Ironcross
In 1972, it was actually worse to finally where the BB`s were dropped completely except for over the counter off road LS7 454`s.

454s were dropped after '74.
Old 06-14-2008, 05:44 PM
  #6  
early shark
Melting Slicks
 
early shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Nevada City California
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

NMT1957,

The reason for the difference in net horsepower ratings between the '71 model at 285 hp and the '72 model at 270 hp is two fold. Further recalibrations were done to the quadraject carburetor and retarding of the ignition timing further from 4 degrees to 8 degrees.

The gross rating for the 1972 Corvette LS5 is 350 hp.
Old 06-14-2008, 06:19 PM
  #7  
darkmercury
Le Mans Master
 
darkmercury's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,318
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Using the matching block/heads/intake...
What Mods could be done to increase the HP on the 72-454 with today's available parts?

Maybe a 770cfmStreet Avenger Holley Carb probably will help...
Then what???

Nothing radical.... just a reliable increase for fun driving and strong running.
Old 06-14-2008, 06:56 PM
  #8  
zwede
Race Director
 
zwede's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 11,300
Received 333 Likes on 255 Posts

Default

Not much you can do unless you're willing to go into the motor. The stock Q-jet has more than enough flow, no gain by going to a holley. Headers will help, that's about it. Some gains by swapping the cam but you don't have the compression to support anything radical.

The LS4 & LS5 need compression and a good intake to come alive. After that a decent set of heads and cam and you'll easily pass the 500hp mark.
The following users liked this post:
MISTERZ06 (05-18-2017)
Old 06-14-2008, 09:24 PM
  #9  
NMT1957
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
NMT1957's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Jefferson Hills PA
Posts: 993
Received 44 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

I had my heart set on buying a 1970 Big Block because of the 390 HP rating, but due to limited availability and higher price I may go to a 1972 Big Block 270 HP. It kinda breaks my heart so I just wanted to know how much difference there really was between the two motors. Im sure the 1972 will have plenty of HP , its just the idea of it I have to get used to. Thanks.
Old 06-14-2008, 09:35 PM
  #10  
darkmercury
Le Mans Master
 
darkmercury's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,318
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Slowly save up for some engine work... or go heads and cam for the HP.
I'm considering a 72 BB too... In due time, I'd potentially be willing to let a qualified person do a lil' engine work for more HP without breaking up the matching numbers or damaging the original parts. Nothing radical but better than 72's stock setup numbers.

I'm never racing or running the car down the strip anyway... but it would be cool to know you have created a better HP situation for the car. The sound of power and feeling when BB drives by is just kickazz.

Originally Posted by NMT1957
I had my heart set on buying a 1970 Big Block because of the 390 HP rating, but due to limited availability and higher price I may go to a 1972 Big Block 270 HP. It kinda breaks my heart so I just wanted to know how much difference there really was between the two motors. Im sure the 1972 will have plenty of HP , its just the idea of it I have to get used to. Thanks.
Old 06-14-2008, 10:08 PM
  #11  
early shark
Melting Slicks
 
early shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Nevada City California
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

NMT1957,

The 1972 Corvette LS5 engine has a net torque rating of 395 ft lbs. The strongest L78 396 engine only had 410 ft lbs of torque, and thats at the gross rating!

You just need to buy a '72 Corvette LS5 WITHOUT a/c, look for a M20, 3:36 ratio drivetrain, the car will feel plenty strong. If you can find an M21, 3:55 even better! You won't need to get into the engine.
The following users liked this post:
Yankeededandy (04-20-2016)
Old 06-14-2008, 10:49 PM
  #12  
CCrane65
Safety Car

 
CCrane65's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 3,766
Received 48 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by early shark
NMT1957,

The 1972 Corvette LS5 engine has a net torque rating of 395 ft lbs. The strongest L78 396 engine only had 410 ft lbs of torque, and thats at the gross rating!

You just need to buy a '72 Corvette LS5 WITHOUT a/c, look for a M20, 3:36 ratio drivetrain, the car will feel plenty strong. If you can find an M21, 3:55 even better! You won't need to get into the engine.
My 1972 shifter console plate says the torque is 455 lbs ft.
and 8.5:1 compression.

And it has A/C, 3.08 rear and M20. Cruises down the highway at 70 running 2500 rpm.

And I can smoke the tires (radials, not bias ply) anytime I want. Completely stock.


cc

Last edited by CCrane65; 06-16-2008 at 11:26 PM. Reason: Console plate does not have HP on it.
Old 06-15-2008, 12:11 AM
  #13  
CCrane65
Safety Car

 
CCrane65's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 3,766
Received 48 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NMT1957
I had my heart set on buying a 1970 Big Block because of the 390 HP rating, but due to limited availability and higher price I may go to a 1972 Big Block 270 HP. It kinda breaks my heart so I just wanted to know how much difference there really was between the two motors. Im sure the 1972 will have plenty of HP , its just the idea of it I have to get used to. Thanks.
Be careful about intake manifold changes. Many others on the forum have learned the hard way that there are very few that will clear the stock BB hood and those that do don't offer much improvement if any. The most common suggestion is to go with a factory intake such as an earlier aluminum from either an LS6 or a 427.

You could also consider having the stock intake ported. Most standard hot rodding tricks will work as long as you keep in imnd the clearance issue.

cc
Old 06-15-2008, 09:26 AM
  #14  
nutsy
Melting Slicks
 
nutsy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: CA.
Posts: 2,387
Received 123 Likes on 78 Posts

Default

my 72 big block is definitly faster than my 70 bb was. maybe because i got 68 heads that have more compression. anyone know more about this? also my 72 is a auto, 70 was a 4 speed. with a newly rebuilt engine.
Old 06-16-2008, 12:33 PM
  #15  
Chris Farrer
Burning Brakes
 
Chris Farrer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Hobart Tasmania
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would say my '72 BB Auto will set you back in the seat off the start but the acceleration is not startling as is not the top speed.
The new Nissan Skyline GTR now that's something else.
I didn't buy my car to goof off, just for cruising.
You just can't beat the rumble of a Big Block with that unique sound.
Old 06-16-2008, 03:23 PM
  #16  
Ironcross
Race Director
 
Ironcross's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Taylor Michigan
Posts: 12,142
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by early shark
NMT1957,

The 1972 Corvette LS5 engine has a net torque rating of 395 ft lbs. The strongest L78 396 engine only had 410 ft lbs of torque, and thats at the gross rating!

You just need to buy a '72 Corvette LS5 WITHOUT a/c, look for a M20, 3:36 ratio drivetrain, the car will feel plenty strong. If you can find an M21, 3:55 even better! You won't need to get into the engine.
A actual quote from 'Bill Thomas racing engines' for a L78 396 is 415 on the torque side but at only 4000 RPM and the Horsepower is 425 at 6500 RPM.....
Old 06-17-2008, 12:05 AM
  #17  
73, Dark Blue 454
Melting Slicks
 
73, Dark Blue 454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

450-500 HP is child's play with a 454 if you'll up the flow and compression with some aftermarket heads (Brodix RR-BB-O?) and add cam in the 230 - 240 @ .50, then run some 1-7/8" long tubes. Your cam choice will be determined by rear gear, tranny, and your goals.

Now the bad news. I'm not sure the stock IRS will hold up to 500 HP especially if you run sticky tires.

Good luck!

Get notified of new replies

To 1970 454/390 Hp Vs 1972 454/270 Hp

Old 09-29-2010, 03:57 PM
  #18  
SoonerBJJ
2nd Gear
 
SoonerBJJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zwede
The LS4 & LS5 need compression and a good intake to come alive. After that a decent set of heads and cam and you'll easily pass the 500hp mark.
Sorry for the necropost but this thread is relevant for my own plans.

This and other references in this thread to increasing compression in the LS5 to gain HP. Is this referring to the 71 and beyond LS5 wherein compression was dropped from that of the 70 454?

I wouldn't imagine that you could squeeze much more in the 70 if you're running 93 octane?

Without sending the original block to a machine shop or opening up more room under the hood, it seems the options for improving the intake and cylinder heads on the 70 BB are limited if I'm interpreting all this correctly.
Old 09-29-2010, 04:20 PM
  #19  
jr9170
Race Director
 
jr9170's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: YANKEES UNIVERSE 70 454-LS5 500 ft-lbs Torque
Posts: 13,248
Received 1,069 Likes on 755 Posts

Default

Love my 70 454 lots of torque and plenty of power.
Old 09-29-2010, 04:34 PM
  #20  
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
 
BBCorv70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Tolland CT
Posts: 3,176
Received 107 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NMT1957
I had my heart set on buying a 1970 Big Block because of the 390 HP rating, but due to limited availability and higher price I may go to a 1972 Big Block 270 HP. It kinda breaks my heart so I just wanted to know how much difference there really was between the two motors. Im sure the 1972 will have plenty of HP , its just the idea of it I have to get used to. Thanks.
Is the 70 really that much harder to find or more expensive than the 72? They're quite similar.

So far as max compression goes, I thought I read somewhere that you can get around some of this with a modern cam?

The 70 has a closed chamber head. I think they went to open chamber in 71. Many people prefer the open chamber anyway.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1970 454/390 Hp Vs 1972 454/270 Hp



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 PM.