When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Since Polo submitted an LS, I will submit mine. I am going for the "if the factory would have had an LS" Look....and I'm not a big fan or engine covers. Nothing personal to those who have them, just not what I want. Any, I know many folks don't like the look, but I do,
Last edited by vjjack04; 12-03-2022 at 07:22 AM.
Reason: clarity
I like the Chrysler Ram Induction but have learned to appreciate the Rat motor. Interesting discussion about Chrysler vs GM when it came to being all in as Mr. Hampton put it. My theory is that Chrysler's Hemi development was a WW II aviation engine effort supplanted by Jet technology. When Chrysler developed it into the Hemi for passenger car engines it had higher volumetric efficiency than Olds or Caddy. Racers paid attention, Briggs Cunningham and the like went to Chrysler Chief engineer Bob Rogers, a racer at heart himself and said why don't you guys build a car for that engine? At the time Exner was finishing up the all new 55 Chryslers. Rogers lobbied for a special version with a stiff suspension and dual quads on a race cammed version of the 331. It would be the very first factory built race car that could be used on the street. It made 300 HP, the first street car to do so and the 300 was born. Those who raced them, Cunningham and Carl Kiekhaefer in particular worked closely with Chrysler to improve the Hemi. The Hemi begot the b/RB wedge upon which the 426 Hemi was based. So for Chrysler, its V8's were always born of high performance, so they were as Dan put it "all in" for going fast. Bob Rogers was the spirit behind almost all of this.
Chevrolet's small block V8 on the other hand was built entirely to a cost and function under the hood of an inexpensive car. It was small and light. It used stamped steel rockers on pressed studs instead of shafts. Ed Cole designed a good little engine whose ubiquity rather than technical brilliance was its success. To make it race reliably it needs modifications. The Chrysler engines would use more fuel and air to do the same thing. Chrysler engines and transmissions were the best in the world for a long time. Some might argue they still are. Not for long.
Dan
"pedals to the floor, hear his dual quads drink, now the 413's lead is starting to shrink, ect ,ect, ect"
Saw my first Cross Ram in the sixties when I was in high school, probably in a Chrysler 300, still one of the coolest engines ever.
65vette396 (12-06-2022),Jermo (12-03-2022),ML67 (12-03-2022),norway66 (12-12-2022),Tuna Joe (12-03-2022),Vet65te (12-03-2022) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Here is the replica Grand Sport engine in my '63 Grand Sport vintage racer.
You are looking at an all-aluminum SBC based on an early Donovan aluminum block, AFR heads, and a Moon intake manifold fed by Italian Weber DCOE45 carburators.
Here is the replica Grand Sport engine in my '63 Grand Sport vintage racer.
You are looking at an all-aluminum SBC based on an early Donovan aluminum block, AFR heads, and a Moon intake manifold fed by Italian Weber DCOE45 carburators.
That never loses the ability to get the adrenaline flowing! I'll bet that engine not only sounds good but runs equally good as well!
Thanks for the picture Jim!
I still have these, never been installed set waiting for use on the '62!
That never loses the ability to get the adrenaline flowing! I'll bet that engine not only sounds good but runs equally good as well!
Thanks for the picture Jim!
I still have these, never been installed set waiting for use on the '62!
Pat
I didn't know you had those, Pat! I'll be happy to help you get them dialed in when you get them on an engine. I've got a wide band air/fuel gauge which will make the task pretty simple.
12-03-2022, 07:20 AM
My favorite.................of course I'm bias! 
begee22
