C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

B28 versus B26 Vac Advance Canisters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2014, 04:01 PM
  #1  
brucep
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
brucep's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Harvard MA
Posts: 764
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts

Default B28 versus B26 Vac Advance Canisters

A paper written by Duke Williams that can be found on BarryK's website says the B26 Vacuum Advance Canister is more appropriate for an L-79 than the factory recommended B28. My L-79 is currently set up with an B28. If I switched to a B26 I wonder what advantage or differences in performance or tuning options I would have.

Here is a link to the paper:

http://www.lbfun.com/warehouse/tech_...ance_Specs.pdf


Thanks.
Old 07-24-2014, 04:59 PM
  #2  
Gary's '66
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gary's '66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Wilton Ca.
Posts: 3,115
Received 192 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

I'm no expert, but having dealt with MANY vac canisters with my L-79 I can tell you what I've encountered.

To start, you need to determine how much vacuum your motor is pulling at idle (assuming timing, carb, etc. is set proper) and that will give an idea of what canister to employ.

Another thing that will affect vac adv. can is whether or not the points plate bushing is there and, even then, sometimes the slot it rides in needs tweaking.

Lastly, before I install ANY aftermarket can I always test it using a Mightyvac to determine just how accurate it is. Many that I've tested where WAY off.
Hope this helps.
Old 07-24-2014, 05:20 PM
  #3  
plaidside
Safety Car
 
plaidside's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: New York New York
Posts: 4,819
Received 1,126 Likes on 553 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified

Default

If you have low vacuum at idle, below 13" then you need the B-28 can. But it might cause some pinging due to the advance added at low vacuum.
If you have at least 14-15" vacuum at idle then you can use the B-26.
This will remove the advance plugged in by the can sooner and should reduce pinging issues.
Joe
Old 07-24-2014, 06:22 PM
  #4  
Ironcross
Race Director
 
Ironcross's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Taylor Michigan
Posts: 12,142
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by plaidside
If you have low vacuum at idle, below 13" then you need the B-28 can. But it might cause some pinging due to the advance added at low vacuum.
If you have at least 14-15" vacuum at idle then you can use the B-26.
This will remove the advance plugged in by the can sooner and should reduce pinging issues.
Joe
Why worry, your at full advance immediately.......
Old 07-25-2014, 01:46 AM
  #5  
Boyan
Drifting
 
Boyan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Woodland Hills CA
Posts: 1,954
Received 466 Likes on 294 Posts

Default B26

I have not tried it on an L79, but I can tell you Duke is right on. He told me to put a B26 on my 63 L76 when I had problems with it running after a rebuild. His advice made it run perfectly. Just follow what he wrote.

Boyan
Old 07-25-2014, 03:35 PM
  #6  
brucep
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
brucep's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Harvard MA
Posts: 764
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Boyan
I have not tried it on an L79, but I can tell you Duke is right on. He told me to put a B26 on my 63 L76 when I had problems with it running after a rebuild. His advice made it run perfectly. Just follow what he wrote.

Boyan
Thanks all. My L-79 idles at 13-13.5. Mightyvac testing of 2 new B26 cans shows their advance to be all in at 13. Following Dukes rule that the can you use should be all in at at least 2 inches below idle vac, it looks like I should be sticking with the factory recommended B28.

Get notified of new replies

To B28 versus B26 Vac Advance Canisters




Quick Reply: B28 versus B26 Vac Advance Canisters



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 PM.