C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Double hump heads for 63 327

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2013, 07:01 PM
  #1  
mrtexas
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
mrtexas's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Sugar Land tx
Posts: 1,388
Received 65 Likes on 50 Posts

Default Double hump heads for 63 327

When I had a valve job done, the machine shop said these are the heads everyone wants. Really? What is so special about them? Are they the right thing for a 63 327?



Old 05-15-2013, 07:54 PM
  #2  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,859 Likes on 1,102 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrtexas
When I had a valve job done, the machine shop said these are the heads everyone wants. Really? What is so special about them? Are they the right thing for a 63 327?
Those are 461 heads, which were used on '61 fuelies, '62 300/340/360hp, all '63 -'64 optional engines, and all '65-'66 327's. They came with 1.94"/1.50" valves, or with 2.02"/1.60" valves and an unshrouding cut in the chamber on all applications 340hp and up; back in the day, they were considered excellent high-flowing heads (with factory 2.02/1.60 valves).

If the surface of the double-hump symbol on the heads in the photo are machined flat, they're correct Flint heads; if that surface is as-cast, they're Tonawanda non-Corvette heads. The casting date codes (under the valve covers) will also ID Flint vs. Tonawanda.

Last edited by JohnZ; 05-16-2013 at 04:18 PM. Reason: Added '64
Old 05-15-2013, 08:02 PM
  #3  
devildog
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
devildog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: fighter pilots make movies, bomber pilots make history
Posts: 1,210
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yes, they are the heads used on a 63 327 engine.

The phrase 'everyone wants' is a bit of a question. However, there are many after market heads that flow much better. If aluminum after market, runs with higher compression but less detonation.

Not particularly hard to find, I have two good sets in the corner of the garage (large valves with unshrouding cut).

Joe

Last edited by devildog; 05-15-2013 at 08:05 PM.
Old 05-15-2013, 09:56 PM
  #4  
wolfman64
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
wolfman64's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,584
Received 319 Likes on 181 Posts
2020 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

John,

As a matter of record....Were the 461's with the 2.02" and 1.60" valves also not used on the '64 327/365 HP?

Paul
Old 05-15-2013, 10:43 PM
  #5  
65specialk
Burning Brakes
 
65specialk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Gasburg Virginia
Posts: 1,091
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Had a set FS on this forum and couldn't give them away. I am taking a set of 63's and a set of 65's along as a 62 BW T-10 to the scrap yard on Saturday unless anybody wants to buy them. Dave .
Old 05-16-2013, 11:26 AM
  #6  
oldsarge
Race Director
 
oldsarge's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: Canboro Ontario
Posts: 10,980
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wolfman64
John,

As a matter of record....Were the 461's with the 2.02" and 1.60" valves also not used on the '64 327/365 HP?

Paul
Paul, yes they were.
Old 05-16-2013, 12:44 PM
  #7  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,773 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

At the risk of being criticized and ridiculed, AGAIN, (I'm sick of it!!!!), I'll step in here and add some comments for better clarification.
The heads with the double hump symbols on each end, first appeared in 1961 on the Fuel Injected Corvette engines ONLY--------------nothing else. Thus, the origin of the term "fuelie heads". This same head was used through 1963. These were the 461 X heads. The X (contrary to frequent belief) DID NOT follow the casting number. The X was on the UNDERSIDE of the head near the intake surface.
ALL 461X (1961-63) ONLY came with 1.94/1.5 valves. In 1962 the 461X head was used on all optional (327) engines, BOTH Vettes and pass cars. Only the base 327 engine (250hp) still had the pyramid symbols.






The 461 head (NO X) was introduced in 64. There were some minor casting changes made to it including a slight change to the combustion chamber. The 64-66 461 heads came in BOTH 1.94/1.5-2.02/1.6 versions. The raw castings were the same, the difference was in machining for valves and unshrouding of the chamber wall around the intake valve if the head received 2.02 valves. The solid lifter engines (as well as the 350hp hyd cam) got the 2.02 heads, all others got the 1.94 version.
Below is a before and after comparrison of 461X/461 heads that have been opened up for 2.02/1.6 valves and unshrouding of the chamber wall. This unshrouding was done by the factory for 2.02 heads and ANY good machine shop that is familiar with these heads can do the same (as done below).




Sometime in mid-late 66, the 462 replaced the 461 head. In 68 the 291 and 292 heads replaced the 462 head, but the most distinguishing difference was the boss/hole for the temperature sending unit between #1 and #3 exhaust ports. This was a one year configuration. That is, the ends of the head were plain with only the double hump symbols AND the hole on the side for the temp sender.
ALLLLLLLLL of these double hump heads (461X, 461, 462, 291, 292) are virutally the same with very little differences.
Then in 69, due to changes in the accessories bolted to the engine, a very noticeable change was made to the ends of the heads. Additional bosses were cast for threaded holes to mount accessories such as AC, alternator, PS, etc. The chambers and ports of 69-70 double hump heads were basically unchanged. The next big change was in 71 with chambers significantly increased to around 76cc for lower compression.

ALL of the 61-68 double hump heads---------------PROVIDED THEY ARE IN GOOD, REBUILDABLE CONDITION WITH NO CRACKS----------------are, or can be made into excellent heads. It can be quite costly, and can even cost more to upgrade old double hump heads rather than to buy much better aftermarket heads. BUT ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL aftermarket heads will have the flat, machined surfaces on each end with threaded holes. And for the person wanting the "plain" look of the earlier double hump heads, then the best option is to spend the money having them upgraded.
Except for my 70 Chevelle with a SB400, all of my other engines have early double hump heads with plain ends that have been re-worked and larger stainless valves added along with guide plates and screw-in studs.

For moderate performance, I also add roller TIP rocker arms (I see no benefit spending extra money for full roller rockers on a 5000-6000rpm engine).
One of the best, and more "modern" upgrades that can be done is to go with a retro roller cam/lifters which are readily availabe for the older engines.

Last edited by DZAUTO; 05-16-2013 at 06:34 PM.
The following users liked this post:
patg84 (10-12-2023)
Old 05-16-2013, 01:05 PM
  #8  
Rokndad
Racer
 
Rokndad's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: San Clemente California
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Best concise description ever, Tom. Thanks.

Tom
Old 05-16-2013, 01:14 PM
  #9  
DansYellow66
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DansYellow66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 15,777
Received 2,629 Likes on 1,960 Posts

Default

Interesting even though I don't have a SB engine.

Tom - fill us in sometime on the latest progress on the old Daisy Mae B-26.

Dan
Old 05-16-2013, 01:16 PM
  #10  
jimh_1962
Le Mans Master
 
jimh_1962's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Norcal CA
Posts: 6,738
Received 554 Likes on 447 Posts
2018 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

thanks teacher!
Old 05-16-2013, 01:33 PM
  #11  
66jack
Team Owner
 
66jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 30,381
Received 831 Likes on 575 Posts

Default

DoZen Apples for the Teach
Old 05-16-2013, 04:24 PM
  #12  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,859 Likes on 1,102 Posts

Default

Great post, Tom, as always.

A-26 update?
Old 05-16-2013, 04:25 PM
  #13  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,859 Likes on 1,102 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wolfman64
John,

As a matter of record....Were the 461's with the 2.02" and 1.60" valves also not used on the '64 327/365 HP?

Paul
Yes, they were (I edited my post - forgot '64).
Old 05-16-2013, 04:40 PM
  #14  
devildog
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
devildog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: fighter pilots make movies, bomber pilots make history
Posts: 1,210
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks Tom very good. I was wondering about the 462.

Joe
Old 05-16-2013, 05:43 PM
  #15  
stratplus
Drifting
 
stratplus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,614
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Tom, thanks for the clarification and photos.
Old 05-17-2013, 12:32 PM
  #16  
rene-paul
Burning Brakes
 
rene-paul's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Captain Cook Hawaii
Posts: 908
Received 69 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

Thank You Tom!
Brgds,
Rene
Old 05-17-2013, 12:52 PM
  #17  
Last 62
Racer
 
Last 62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Mukilteo Washington
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tom,
Just to add a tid-bit of info to your right-on explanation on these heads.

As a NHRA super stock racer since the 70's, the 461x head became the head to use because the NHRA listed the intake ports with a larger volume than the 461 or the 462. I think it was around 5cc bigger. Bigger ports means more power.

I even changed my 67 chevyII to a 66 so that I could use the x head.

Jim

Get notified of new replies

To Double hump heads for 63 327

Old 05-17-2013, 01:13 PM
  #18  
65air_coupe
Melting Slicks

 
65air_coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 2,854
Received 365 Likes on 181 Posts

Default

Thanks Tom, best and most concise explanation with great photos to boot.
Old 05-17-2013, 01:31 PM
  #19  
B-52
Advanced
 
B-52's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Jamesport, NY
Posts: 91
Received 48 Likes on 16 Posts

Default Performance

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
At the risk of being criticized and ridiculed, AGAIN, (I'm sick of it!!!!), I'll step in here and add some comments for better clarification.
The heads with the double hump symbols on each end, first appeared in 1961 on the Fuel Injected Corvette engines ONLY--------------nothing else. Thus, the origin of the term "fuelie heads". This same head was used through 1963. These were the 461 X heads. The X (contrary to frequent belief) DID NOT follow the casting number. The X was on the UNDERSIDE of the head near the intake surface.
ALL 461X (1961-63) ONLY came with 1.94/1.5 valves. In 1962 the 461X head was used on all optional (327) engines, BOTH Vettes and pass cars. Only the base 327 engine (250hp) still had the pyramid symbols.






The 461 head (NO X) was introduced in 64. There were some minor casting changes made to it including a slight change to the combustion chamber. The 64-66 461 heads came in BOTH 1.94/1.5-2.02/1.6 versions. The raw castings were the same, the difference was in machining for valves and unshrouding of the chamber wall around the intake valve if the head received 2.02 valves. The solid lifter engines (as well as the 350hp hyd cam) got the 2.02 heads, all others got the 1.94 version.
Below is a before and after comparrison of 461X/461 heads that have been opened up for 2.02/1.6 valves and unshrouding of the chamber wall. This unshrouding was done by the factory for 2.02 heads and ANY good machine shop that is familiar with these heads can do the same (as done below).




Sometime in mid-late 66, the 462 replaced the 461 head. In 68 the 291 and 292 heads replaced the 462 head, but the most distinguishing difference was the boss/hole for the temperature sending unit between #1 and #3 exhaust ports. This was a one year configuration. That is, the ends of the head were plain with only the double hump symbols AND the hole on the side for the temp sender.
ALLLLLLLLL of these double hump heads (461X, 461, 462, 291, 292) are virutally the same with very little differences.
Then in 69, due to changes in the accessories bolted to the engine, a very noticeable change was made to the ends of the heads. Additional bosses were cast for threaded holes to mount accessories such as AC, alternator, PS, etc. The chambers and ports of 69-70 double hump heads were basically unchanged. The next big change was in 71 with chambers significantly increased to around 76cc for lower compression.

ALL of the 61-68 double hump heads---------------PROVIDED THEY ARE IN GOOD, REBUILDABLE CONDITION WITH NO CRACKS----------------are, or can be made into excellent heads. It can be quite costly, and can even cost more to upgrade old double hump heads rather than to buy much better aftermarket heads. BUT ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL aftermarket heads will have the flat, machined surfaces on each end with threaded holes. And for the person wanting the "plain" look of the earlier double hump heads, then the best option is to spend the money having them upgraded.
Except for my 70 Chevelle with a SB400, all of my other engines have early double hump heads with plain ends that have been re-worked and larger stainless valves added along with guide plates and screw-in studs.

For moderate performance, I also add roller TIP rocker arms (I see no benefit spending extra money for full roller rockers on a 5000-6000rpm engine).
One of the best, and more "modern" upgrades that can be done is to go with a retro roller cam/lifters which are readily availabe for the older engines.
Was/is there a noticeable performance increase with the 2.02 versus the 1.94 valve heads. It would seem there would be. I have a 1963 340shp solid lifter car and assume from your description it being pre 1964 would have the 1.94 valves?
Wish I had looked more carefully at the valves when I put the heads on.
Old 05-17-2013, 01:57 PM
  #20  
maggiesadie8525
Racer
 
maggiesadie8525's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 480
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default 490 heads

Hi John, would you say that in #1 photo that they are not Flint corvette Heads? Thanks John


Quick Reply: Double hump heads for 63 327



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.