C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Converting to front disc, proportioning valve needed or not ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2012, 11:30 PM
  #1  
ryan22
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ryan22's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 942
Received 49 Likes on 19 Posts

Default Converting to front disc, proportioning valve needed or not ?

I've done alot of reading in the forum about this and have found 2 different opinions as to whether or not a proportioning valve is needed when you convert to front disc and leave drum brakes on the rear.

Some who have this setup with no PV say their brakes work perfectly well, don't lock up. I understand how the PV functions. As I understand it a PV may not be needed depending on the compatibility of the brake system components.

I'm converting to front disc now. Please let me know if its worth doing the install without a PV and seeing how it functions or should i install a PV right from the start ?

thanks-
Old 08-24-2012, 01:04 AM
  #2  
Procrastination Racing
Le Mans Master
 
Procrastination Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 6,248
Received 250 Likes on 173 Posts

Default

Search again. Most of it depends on what you use for a master cylinder.

If you use a single master cylinder ('65, '64, '63, and back) you need a way to get front and rear pressures different.

If you use a Corvette dual master cylinder, it is set for f/r disks and so the rears won't be right for drums unless you alter the pressure.

If you use a master cylinder form something like the front disk/ rear drum Chevelles, Camaros, etc, then you won't have to change, but they may not be set up ideally for a Corvette's balance.
Old 08-24-2012, 07:09 AM
  #3  
mashinter
Drifting
 
mashinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Rochester Hills Michigan
Posts: 1,913
Received 71 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ryan22
Some who have this setup with no PV say their brakes work perfectly well, don't lock up. I understand how the PV functions. As I understand it a PV may not be needed depending on the compatibility of the brake system components.
The problem with drum brakes is most are self-energizing (including Corvette rear drums). If you double the input pressure, you will get more than double the output torque. That doesn't happen with disc brakes.

OE brakes are designed so they work properly at both light pressure and high pressure. That requires a PV because the rear drum brakes will "lock themselves up" at high pressure.

If your cobbled system doesn't lock rear brakes before the fronts lock, then the rears aren't doing much at light pressure, but you don't need a PV....and your rear linings will live forever.
Old 08-24-2012, 07:19 AM
  #4  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

My 61 has an original C1 M/C and 1973 Camaro front disc brakes on the original king pin setup with NO P/V and works fine. Probably not tweaked to the very peak of front/ rear balance but after 6 years of driving this setup -- no complaints.

My 67 Chevelle has a front disc conversion by previous owner with original power dual M/C with NO P/V and tries to swap ends on hard stops..so I'm putting a P/V in next week.

Go figure...

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 08-24-2012 at 07:21 AM.
Old 08-24-2012, 07:20 AM
  #5  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,733
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default

FWIW.....

I converted my 56 Chevy to front discs about a year ago.

I still have the original rear drums.

I bought a pre-engineered kit specifically for 55-56-57 Chevies. It has a dual master cylinder designed for front disc/rear drum.

I do not need, nor do I have a proportioning valve, and my brakes work just fine.

Now, IF you're putting together a system on your own, using parts from here and there, all bets are off. If you purchased a conversion kit specifically for your Corvette, I think you'll be just fine without a proportioning valve.

Chuck
Old 08-24-2012, 07:27 AM
  #6  
mike16
Racer
 
mike16's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

opinions are opinions.

you need a perportioning valve
Old 08-24-2012, 08:22 AM
  #7  
ryan22
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ryan22's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 942
Received 49 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

"If you use a single master cylinder ('65, '64, '63, and back) you need a way to get front and rear pressures different."

What if i'm using a single master cylinder correct/original style for our 62, I assume its the same situation as if a 63-65 MC is used- I still need the PV to get the front & rear pressures different ?

thx-

Last edited by ryan22; 08-24-2012 at 08:53 AM.
Old 08-24-2012, 08:48 AM
  #8  
Pop Chevy
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Pop Chevy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Sarver Pa
Posts: 4,570
Received 784 Likes on 536 Posts
2021 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

I would suggest putting it together and trying it. You can always go back and make changes. I look at that as no big deal. I put big disc's on the front of my 57 Chevy pickup and ran the stock master, it was o-k. The stock drums sucked especially with a 400 sb under the hood.
Old 08-24-2012, 09:06 AM
  #9  
C-1 Generation 2
Melting Slicks
 
C-1 Generation 2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Imperial Missouri
Posts: 2,251
Received 61 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

On my 62 I changed the whole front suspension to JMR and used the 70-81 Camaro spindles and disc with a dual master cylinder(non power) and a pv. The pv is set fully open for the rear and has never had a lockup,even on panic stops. Makes me think that on my setup I probably didn't need the pv.
Old 08-24-2012, 12:24 PM
  #10  
Plasticman
Race Director

 
Plasticman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Beverly Hills (Pine Ridge) Florida
Posts: 10,152
Received 525 Likes on 374 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C-1 Generation 2
On my 62 I changed the whole front suspension to JMR and used the 70-81 Camaro spindles and disc with a dual master cylinder(non power) and a pv. The pv is set fully open for the rear and has never had a lockup,even on panic stops. Makes me think that on my setup I probably didn't need the pv.
That appears to be the general opinion (including mine). I have had front discs since 2005 (and I do not have a PV), and only once did I feel that the rears locked up before the fronts, but still came to a very controlled stop.

I am changing to a dual master cylinder (old single has an extremely minor amount of internal bleed down due to pitting of the bore), so since I have to revise the rear brake line, I will put a PV in place. I really don't expect to see any change (based on 7 years previous history). The PV will make a nice junction block..........

Plasticman
Old 08-24-2012, 01:00 PM
  #11  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,764
Received 1,169 Likes on 487 Posts

Default

If you use a Corvette M/C of ANY vintage or configuration, yes, you most definately need it!

I did the front conversion using all Corvette parts and at first I didn't include it.

You'll be cleaning the stains off your seat covers the first time you encounter a panic stop without it.

Mine is under the dash (red handle) for adjustment "on the fly." Be forwarned that if you race the car, by rule many sanctioning bodies do not allow the proportioning valve to be located in the cockpit.

Furthermore, I run the valve in position #2, so I'm cutting the rear brakes way down.






Last edited by toddalin; 08-24-2012 at 01:17 PM.
Old 08-24-2012, 01:12 PM
  #12  
Plasticman
Race Director

 
Plasticman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Beverly Hills (Pine Ridge) Florida
Posts: 10,152
Received 525 Likes on 374 Posts

Default

I think the OP needs to identify what year Corvette he is changing to front discs. Appears that the C1 folks (me included) don't think a PV is needed, but the C2 folks do.........

And since his profile lists only a 66, he already should have discs all the way around.

Plasticman

Last edited by Plasticman; 08-24-2012 at 01:14 PM.
Old 08-24-2012, 03:13 PM
  #13  
1snake
Le Mans Master
 
1snake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 8,000
Received 652 Likes on 446 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mike16
opinions are opinions.

you need a perportioning valve
Originally Posted by toddalin
If you use a Corvette M/C of ANY vintage or configuration, yes, you most definately need it!
You may "get by" without one but you won't get optimum performance unless you have one and it's properly adjusted. You'll be glad you did when/if you have to make a panic stop that lives depend on.

Jim
Old 08-24-2012, 04:21 PM
  #14  
ryan22
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ryan22's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 942
Received 49 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

This is a 62 we're converting to front disc, sorry not have mentioned it initially.
Old 08-24-2012, 04:54 PM
  #15  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,764
Received 1,169 Likes on 487 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ryan22
This is a 62 we're converting to front disc, sorry not have mentioned it initially.
What is the weight distribution? It seems that the more percentage of weight on the front, the more you need the valve to reduce the pressure to the rears. The mid-year S/Bs are ~49/51 front to rear.

But it would also depend on the size of the rear drums. IIRC, the 63/64 have 2.5" x 11" drums in back. If the older cars had smaller drums/pads, that could act like a proportioning valve in that there is less material to grab to "lock up"

Regardless of weight distribution and drum size, put it in. You can "fine tune" the system better than without it and the cost is minimal in the grand scheme of things. At it's minimum setting, it hardly has any effect, so you can't really go wrong.

Don't forget that if you use a later Corvette M/C, you also need a 10# residual valve on the rear line.

Last edited by toddalin; 08-24-2012 at 05:03 PM.
Old 08-24-2012, 05:45 PM
  #16  
mrtexas
Drifting
 
mrtexas's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Sugar Land tx
Posts: 1,388
Received 65 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

You might consider one of these:

http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Brake-...alve,8904.html
Old 08-24-2012, 11:30 PM
  #17  
C1-Curt
Burning Brakes
 
C1-Curt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Eagleville,TN
Posts: 1,053
Received 51 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrtexas
I just received the Corvette Central Meyers brake line kit with a new dual master and it came with one of these brake metering valves. I installed it but wondered what it was for. The CC kit did not come with a proportioning valve. It will be another month or so before I get it on the road so will not know how it does until then.

Get notified of new replies

To Converting to front disc, proportioning valve needed or not ?

Old 08-25-2012, 10:51 AM
  #18  
ryan22
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ryan22's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 942
Received 49 Likes on 19 Posts

Default Trouble installing proportioning valve

I have our 62 at our mechanics shop for the finishing touches on the disc brake swap.

He's having trouble getting the proportioning valve installed.

The PV i have looks very much like this one at Master Power Brakes. See photo on page 2 of this link-

http://www.mpbrakes.com/uploads/prod...60_Rev8_08.pdf

I've seen some of the PV's forum members have used. This one I have looks much more involved. It has 5 inlet ports.

I'm wondering if there's another PV that would function the same & be a simpler installation ?

thanks again-
Old 08-25-2012, 11:20 AM
  #19  
mashinter
Drifting
 
mashinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Rochester Hills Michigan
Posts: 1,913
Received 71 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

The front disc brake design you use determines if you need a PV.

If the front discs develop more output torque than the front drums did (at all line pressures up to lockup), you shouldn't need a PV.

edit: Ryan, I just saw your post above. I'm not saying you don't need a PV. I'm just spewing theory...

Last edited by mashinter; 08-25-2012 at 11:37 AM.
Old 08-25-2012, 03:27 PM
  #20  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ryan22
I have our 62 at our mechanics shop for the finishing touches on the disc brake swap.

He's having trouble getting the proportioning valve installed.

The PV i have looks very much like this one at Master Power Brakes. See photo on page 2 of this link-

http://www.mpbrakes.com/uploads/prod...60_Rev8_08.pdf

I've seen some of the PV's forum members have used. This one I have looks much more involved. It has 5 inlet ports.
That's a "combination valve", which incorporates the differential pressure warning switch, the metering/hold-off valve for the front disc system, a residual pressure valve for the rear drum system, and the proportioning valve for the rear drum system; they weren't used until the early 70's, and were individually calibrated for each application.

The simple one line-in/one line-out proportioning valve sold by Wilwood, Corvettte Central, etc. will work just fine for your application; if the master cylinder you're using doesn't have a residual pressure valve (RPV) in the rear drum outlet (GM disc/drum master cylinders have them), you'll need a 10 psi external RPV.

Last edited by JohnZ; 08-25-2012 at 03:30 PM.


Quick Reply: Converting to front disc, proportioning valve needed or not ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.