Strange spin at the track
#21
Gasoline Addict
Thread Starter
As best as I can recall, I was not into ABS at this point on the track, as the R888 provided good level of grip. I was threshold braking (as best as I can ) and the sudden loss of electronic braking systems must have adjusted the bias to the rear, like others earlier have pointed out. With the back end being light, as it happened after I already slowed down some, the rears locked up like someone put the handbrake on... except I was totally not expecting it to happen. I do think that it is a dangerous condition, because if happened elsewhere on this track, or most other tracks, the car would have been toast, and possibly so would I. I intend to fix it, just not yet sure how.
Does anyone know what the default proportioning is between front and rear, if ABS module is not controlling the pressures? Would putting a master cylinder with a mechanical proportioning valve provide a predictable safety net when/if the ABS failure were to occur again in the future? I can imagine that even though the brakes would have locked up at some point, it wouldn't have been heavily biased to the rear and would have let me just slide straight off the track into the grass, instead of pirouetting like Katarina Witt during the 1988 Olympics. My BMW friends have already labeled my car a hazard
#22
ABS intervenes much earlier and more often than drivers think. And we have evidence of that here: you thought you weren't using ABS but as soon as the ABS stopped working, full pressure went through to the rear calipers and around you went.
Heavily rear biased. Which means you are utterly dependent on correct ABS function to avoid looping the car and crashing Given the frequency of ABS failures, this is crazy. Which is why I suggest that the brakes should be modified to be safe (ie: front-biased) in the absence of ABS.
And driver should spend a couple of test sessions with the fuse pulled, to get an understanding of the behavior and to learn how to manage front lockups.
lol. I've been racing with no ABS for five years and only really became confident with braking this year.
Precisely.
Does anyone know what the default proportioning is between front and rear, if ABS module is not controlling the pressures?
And driver should spend a couple of test sessions with the fuse pulled, to get an understanding of the behavior and to learn how to manage front lockups.
lol. I've been racing with no ABS for five years and only really became confident with braking this year.
Would putting a master cylinder with a mechanical proportioning valve provide a predictable safety net when/if the ABS failure were to occur again in the future? I can imagine that even though the brakes would have locked up at some point, it wouldn't have been heavily biased to the rear and would have let me just slide straight off the track into the grass, instead of pirouetting like Katarina Witt during the 1988 Olympics.
#23
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,121
Received 8,954 Likes
on
5,345 Posts
Were you experiencing any brake thumping before this happened? As explained in the Stoptech Warped Brake Rotor Myth whitepage the thumping comes from varying amounts of friction around the brake disk. Without ABS functioning you may have had the brakes applied hard enough that a spot with increased friction was encountered by the pads resulting in the wheel slowing too fast thus causing a rear tire to lose its grip and start the clockwise yaw.
Not sure how heavily rear biased the base brake system is. First, the front rotors are larger in diameter than the rear rotors. That automatically gives you front bias, then the piston area for the front calipers is larger than the piston area for the rear calipers which gives more front bias. The front braking capability is ~ 2.66 greater than the rear. However, if the ratio of grip from the front to the rear changes due to tire size selection that could result in more rear bias. When I was having the C1214 issue with my 03Z I found the first few times I hit the brake and downshifted that I had a tendency to lock the rear wheels as I let the clutch out and that wouldn't happen if the ABS was working. My analysis of that problem was I had gotten lazy on my downshifts and the increased drag on the rear tires from letting the clutch out caused a compensating reduction in rear brake force to keep the tires from locking. When the ABS went south that didn't happen and I had to adjust my heel toe technique. I never had an issue with the rears locking at corners similar to the one the OP was entering where no downshift was required.
Bill
Not sure how heavily rear biased the base brake system is. First, the front rotors are larger in diameter than the rear rotors. That automatically gives you front bias, then the piston area for the front calipers is larger than the piston area for the rear calipers which gives more front bias. The front braking capability is ~ 2.66 greater than the rear. However, if the ratio of grip from the front to the rear changes due to tire size selection that could result in more rear bias. When I was having the C1214 issue with my 03Z I found the first few times I hit the brake and downshifted that I had a tendency to lock the rear wheels as I let the clutch out and that wouldn't happen if the ABS was working. My analysis of that problem was I had gotten lazy on my downshifts and the increased drag on the rear tires from letting the clutch out caused a compensating reduction in rear brake force to keep the tires from locking. When the ABS went south that didn't happen and I had to adjust my heel toe technique. I never had an issue with the rears locking at corners similar to the one the OP was entering where no downshift was required.
Bill
#24
Le Mans Master
It is my experience that the car behaves very differently with a failed ABS vs. when the ABS fuse is pulled. I can drive my car both ways and in some races I have had to make the adjustment. It is much harder and more unpredictable to drive when the ABS fails. The bias is not too bad when the fuse is pulled.
Recently, the California T1, GT2, ST2 racing contingent came up with an idea... actually it was FatBillyBob. The idea is to put a switch in the car for when ABS does fail to flip a switch and cut power to ABS and thereby go fully manual. I think that is a great idea as it removes the randomness of a partially functioning/erroring ABS system. I plan to do that.
Recently, the California T1, GT2, ST2 racing contingent came up with an idea... actually it was FatBillyBob. The idea is to put a switch in the car for when ABS does fail to flip a switch and cut power to ABS and thereby go fully manual. I think that is a great idea as it removes the randomness of a partially functioning/erroring ABS system. I plan to do that.
#25
ABS intervenes much earlier and more often than drivers think. And we have evidence of that here: you thought you weren't using ABS but as soon as the ABS stopped working, full pressure went through to the rear calipers and around you went.
Heavily rear biased. Which means you are utterly dependent on correct ABS function to avoid looping the car and crashing Given the frequency of ABS failures, this is crazy. Which is why I suggest that the brakes should be modified to be safe (ie: front-biased) in the absence of ABS.
And driver should spend a couple of test sessions with the fuse pulled, to get an understanding of the behavior and to learn how to manage front lockups.
lol. I've been racing with no ABS for five years and only really became confident with braking this year.
Precisely.
Heavily rear biased. Which means you are utterly dependent on correct ABS function to avoid looping the car and crashing Given the frequency of ABS failures, this is crazy. Which is why I suggest that the brakes should be modified to be safe (ie: front-biased) in the absence of ABS.
And driver should spend a couple of test sessions with the fuse pulled, to get an understanding of the behavior and to learn how to manage front lockups.
lol. I've been racing with no ABS for five years and only really became confident with braking this year.
Precisely.
after a few abs failures, but thankfully no spins because of it.. i like the idea of a proportioning valve setup more and more.
i had the ebcm fail, and the wheel speed sensors/wires break and fail. flat spotted tires suck, luckily i am not THAT fast and pushing that hard to where i got out of control..
i did a whole weekend with no abs and it was a big learning experience, by the end of the weekend i had pep boys pads on the back to keep the rear from locking up - i am on street tires/ rs3's- i believe there to be too much rear bias on my c5.. running a square tire setup could make this worse, compared to the stock staggered setup.
can anybody link us to or share their proportioning valve setup? any suggestions on parts/ vendors? pictures? any info appreciated- for those who don't know much about it.
#26
Gasoline Addict
Thread Starter
Were you experiencing any brake thumping before this happened? As explained in the Stoptech Warped Brake Rotor Myth whitepage the thumping comes from varying amounts of friction around the brake disk. Without ABS functioning you may have had the brakes applied hard enough that a spot with increased friction was encountered by the pads resulting in the wheel slowing too fast thus causing a rear tire to lose its grip and start the clockwise yaw.
Not sure how heavily rear biased the base brake system is. First, the front rotors are larger in diameter than the rear rotors. That automatically gives you front bias, then the piston area for the front calipers is larger than the piston area for the rear calipers which gives more front bias. The front braking capability is ~ 2.66 greater than the rear. However, if the ratio of grip from the front to the rear changes due to tire size selection that could result in more rear bias. When I was having the C1214 issue with my 03Z I found the first few times I hit the brake and downshifted that I had a tendency to lock the rear wheels as I let the clutch out and that wouldn't happen if the ABS was working. My analysis of that problem was I had gotten lazy on my downshifts and the increased drag on the rear tires from letting the clutch out caused a compensating reduction in rear brake force to keep the tires from locking. When the ABS went south that didn't happen and I had to adjust my heel toe technique. I never had an issue with the rears locking at corners similar to the one the OP was entering where no downshift was required.
Bill
Not sure how heavily rear biased the base brake system is. First, the front rotors are larger in diameter than the rear rotors. That automatically gives you front bias, then the piston area for the front calipers is larger than the piston area for the rear calipers which gives more front bias. The front braking capability is ~ 2.66 greater than the rear. However, if the ratio of grip from the front to the rear changes due to tire size selection that could result in more rear bias. When I was having the C1214 issue with my 03Z I found the first few times I hit the brake and downshifted that I had a tendency to lock the rear wheels as I let the clutch out and that wouldn't happen if the ABS was working. My analysis of that problem was I had gotten lazy on my downshifts and the increased drag on the rear tires from letting the clutch out caused a compensating reduction in rear brake force to keep the tires from locking. When the ABS went south that didn't happen and I had to adjust my heel toe technique. I never had an issue with the rears locking at corners similar to the one the OP was entering where no downshift was required.
Bill
Plan to pop by (not pun intended) Danny Popp's shop tomorrow to talk about options and such. I think that a cage is on the horizon for me too, as ext time I get off like that, I may not be as lucky.
#27
Redo all the lines without the abs module, just like old cars used to be, and have an adjustable prop valve for the rear. Lighter and simpler
Or do as I am doing and run a custom pedal setup with dual mc for the brake and a bias bar.
I usually test the brakes in the rain to see when rear locks up when adjusting the valve. This way you are not going as fast to cause the lockup. You want the front to lock before the rears do otherwise....weeeehoooo
Or do as I am doing and run a custom pedal setup with dual mc for the brake and a bias bar.
I usually test the brakes in the rain to see when rear locks up when adjusting the valve. This way you are not going as fast to cause the lockup. You want the front to lock before the rears do otherwise....weeeehoooo
Last edited by Apocolipse; 08-03-2014 at 08:38 PM.
#28
Redo all the lines without the abs module, just like old cars used to be, and have an adjustable prop valve for the rear. Lighter and simpler
Or do as I am doing and run a custom pedal setup with dual mc for the brake and a bias bar.
I usually test the brakes in the rain to see when rear locks up when adjusting the valve. This way you are not going as fast to cause the lockup. You want the front to lock before the rears do otherwise....weeeehoooo
Or do as I am doing and run a custom pedal setup with dual mc for the brake and a bias bar.
I usually test the brakes in the rain to see when rear locks up when adjusting the valve. This way you are not going as fast to cause the lockup. You want the front to lock before the rears do otherwise....weeeehoooo
#29
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Deal's Gap 2004 NCM Motorsports track supporter
Posts: 13,926
Received 1,106 Likes
on
720 Posts
I wish you guys a lot of luck on rerigging the brake system. 3 of us are still trying to get the proportioning correct with a 3rd gen. Camaro. Yes, have tried wildwood adjustable, 3 different M/C's, different pads, different oem proportioning and 1LE valves. Not a linear exercise as one might think.
#30
I wish you guys a lot of luck on rerigging the brake system. 3 of us are still trying to get the proportioning correct with a 3rd gen. Camaro. Yes, have tried wildwood adjustable, 3 different M/C's, different pads, different oem proportioning and 1LE valves. Not a linear exercise as one might think.
http://dougrippie.com/products/drm-c...ster-cylinder/
#31
Le Mans Master
Try pulling the fuse and driving the car before you go to a lot of expensive and exotic solutions.....
#32
Instructor
Drive the car 5 to 10 mph on somethig slick, like gravel. Lock up the brakes. I think you may find you have no REAR brakes.
#33
Supporting Vendor
I have the same issue. I did make contact though -luckily not too bad but scary.
In my case - ABS worked for about 5 cycles 0 and then the front right locked up. YOu could clearly see the skid mark - it was dot dot dot dassssssssh.
All 4 wheel bearings are (now) new SKF's. In order
Check wiring to sensors
Send ECBM to ABS fixer
Scratch head
Car definitely slows quicker when not ABS - but that is not easy to do. Worth the practice for sure.
In my case - ABS worked for about 5 cycles 0 and then the front right locked up. YOu could clearly see the skid mark - it was dot dot dot dassssssssh.
All 4 wheel bearings are (now) new SKF's. In order
Check wiring to sensors
Send ECBM to ABS fixer
Scratch head
Car definitely slows quicker when not ABS - but that is not easy to do. Worth the practice for sure.
#34
Drifting
it does look very much like my spin at the glen.
After the spin, I found the right front ABS wheel speed sensor wire was melted against the exhaust.
•C1226 h - rf excessive wheel speed variation
• C1333 h - rf wheel speed circuit open or shorted
After the spin, I found the right front ABS wheel speed sensor wire was melted against the exhaust.
•C1226 h - rf excessive wheel speed variation
• C1333 h - rf wheel speed circuit open or shorted
#35
Gasoline Addict
Thread Starter
I appreciate all the input and analysis. Next step for me is to swap in my good spare EBCM and see if any codes pop up. Danny suggested I trace the ASR Desired TQ input to check for 5VDC signal. I am worried that the intermittent TCS Nocomm has something to do with a connection somewhere, and not the module being bad. But we shall see by next weekend. I have noticed that the issues surface when it is wet outside... or when the car has been rained on. Not sure if it is really true, but that could indicate a bad connection issue.
#36
Gasoline Addict
Thread Starter
My codes are different though. Just the P1571, TCS No Comm, U1040.
Last edited by tytek; 08-04-2014 at 03:51 PM.
#37
Le Mans Master
I appreciate all the input and analysis. Next step for me is to swap in my good spare EBCM and see if any codes pop up. Danny suggested I trace the ASR Desired TQ input to check for 5VDC signal. I am worried that the intermittent TCS Nocomm has something to do with a connection somewhere, and not the module being bad. But we shall see by next weekend. I have noticed that the issues surface when it is wet outside... or when the car has been rained on. Not sure if it is really true, but that could indicate a bad connection issue.
#38
Le Mans Master
I have the same issue. I did make contact though -luckily not too bad but scary.
In my case - ABS worked for about 5 cycles 0 and then the front right locked up. YOu could clearly see the skid mark - it was dot dot dot dassssssssh.
All 4 wheel bearings are (now) new SKF's. In order
Check wiring to sensors
Send ECBM to ABS fixer
Scratch head
Car definitely slows quicker when not ABS - but that is not easy to do. Worth the practice for sure.
In my case - ABS worked for about 5 cycles 0 and then the front right locked up. YOu could clearly see the skid mark - it was dot dot dot dassssssssh.
All 4 wheel bearings are (now) new SKF's. In order
Check wiring to sensors
Send ECBM to ABS fixer
Scratch head
Car definitely slows quicker when not ABS - but that is not easy to do. Worth the practice for sure.
Your account represents the unpredictability of the result of the ABS failure. Many here have spoken of rear wheel lock-up and that seems most common, but anything can happen in ABS failure. That is why pulling the fuse when if fails is best. That is why I plan to add a cut-off switch so I can manually shut it off if I wish/need.
I have had rear tires lock. I have had front tires lock.
Life is like a broken C5 ABS. You don't know what you are gonna get until you slam on the brakes.
#39
Instructor
Adjustable proportioning valves are a less then ideal solution. Their proportioning is not linear, the pressure reduction varies with pressure. The best solution is the traditional dual master balance bar. Pretty difficult to accomplish in our cars though.
The EBCM's brake balancing comes into play quite often, more often then people realize I think. Seems like anytime you approach threshold braking the computer is doing something.
Seems like the easiest fix would be to completely disable the ABS and change to rear calipers to a smaller piston size and get closer to the natural hydro-mechanical balance of the car.
ABS is nice, when it works, but most of us have been driving at the limit with out it for years, and the C5's near 20 year old design just doesn't seem well suited to the demands of racing.
The EBCM's brake balancing comes into play quite often, more often then people realize I think. Seems like anytime you approach threshold braking the computer is doing something.
Seems like the easiest fix would be to completely disable the ABS and change to rear calipers to a smaller piston size and get closer to the natural hydro-mechanical balance of the car.
ABS is nice, when it works, but most of us have been driving at the limit with out it for years, and the C5's near 20 year old design just doesn't seem well suited to the demands of racing.
#40
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Deal's Gap 2004 NCM Motorsports track supporter
Posts: 13,926
Received 1,106 Likes
on
720 Posts
I can not speak about a 3rd Gen Camaro but this is what I would use if I were going to do this. I have been eyeing this for some time as I plan to upgrade the brakes for the track.
http://dougrippie.com/products/drm-c...ster-cylinder/
http://dougrippie.com/products/drm-c...ster-cylinder/