2010 SCCA ProSolo Finale & Solo Nationals-Lincoln, Ne
#61
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Charleston South Carolina
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Not the way I wanted to move up two positions...but hard to argue that running a wider front tire isn't a performance enhancement.
My guess, and it's just a guess, is that the fender was pushed out due to the running of the 285s, not to make room for them. 285s apparently rub on the front of a GT3, but if you're willing to put up with the rubbing to win why can't you run them? I guess the liner not being connected or inserted into the fender lip was used to to prove something had moved on both sides of the car.
We'll learn more when the Fastrack is posted.
#62
Melting Slicks
When we dq'd cars for obvious things like this, we carefully explained to the violator what he did wrong and explained is appeal rights but then candidly let him know what his chances were for a successful appeal. Seldom did anybody appeal and in the 5 years that I did protest at nationals we were overturned on appeal only once.
If it wasn't a measurable performance advantage, we often assessed a penalty in time or simply upheld the protest, but found that the infraction wasn't a performance gain and let the results stand. The person was told not to come back with the infraction and that was pretty much it. The results were published so that everybody knew that wasn't allowed and we moved on. To get disqualified the infraction had to be both an advantage and it had to be pretty blatant. IMHO this was both and frankly I'm suprised that it got this far.