Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C5 Z06 SCCA Super Stock Alignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2007, 01:58 AM
  #21  
Bimota Guy
Burning Brakes
 
Bimota Guy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 1,076
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TommyBoy72
I see you said 1/4" toe in. That's a lot, more than I've ever run on any car. Do you really run that much?
I ran 3/8" total rear toe when I auto-xed my Z06. I have heard some (at least tried) ran 1/2".
Old 02-13-2007, 06:24 AM
  #22  
talon95
Pro
 
talon95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TommyBoy72
Understood. I'm going to chicken out and go with 1/8" total toe-in and hope that is enough especially since I am 1 mile above sea level. I'll post back with some opinions after I autox it this saturday on the new alignment.
Another option is to go to a bigger front bar so you don't need as much rear toe. I think quite a few people have had success. It worked pretty good for me.

Dave G.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:08 AM
  #23  
TedDBere
Melting Slicks
 
TedDBere's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Charleston South Carolina
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Everything is a trade off. Too much rear toe-in can make the car harder to steer with the throttle. Often owners will dial in more rear toe to compensate for their over aggressiveness with the throttle on corner exit, rather than adjusting their driving style.

Also a tire sticks better when you're sliding the tire with about a 6-8 degree slip angle (bigger contact patch). When you get fast enough to slide your car in the turns then the rear toe-in can cause the contact patch to reduce because you're already starting with a tuned-in slip angle and now you're forcing the tire to exceed that ideal 6-8 degrees.

So as you get faster you may want to reduce your rear toe-in to aid in car balance in the turns and lose some of the corner exit grip. It's always a trade off.

I know of one past national champion in a Z06 who went with 0 rear toe-in. Others who went with tons. As long as you know what it's doing and are OK with that then fine, enjoy.
Old 02-13-2007, 10:13 AM
  #24  
TommyBoy72
Pro
Thread Starter
 
TommyBoy72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm on the smooth side of things and usually slip more like 3-4 degrees according to the Geezcube. On previous rides 6-8 would have been slower especially on Hoosiers.
Old 02-13-2007, 03:19 PM
  #25  
tigerdrvr
Pro
 
tigerdrvr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Alamo CA
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TedDBere
Everything is a trade off. Too much rear toe-in can make the car harder to steer with the throttle. Often owners will dial in more rear toe to compensate for their over aggressiveness with the throttle on corner exit, rather than adjusting their driving style.

Also a tire sticks better when you're sliding the tire with about a 6-8 degree slip angle (bigger contact patch). When you get fast enough to slide your car in the turns then the rear toe-in can cause the contact patch to reduce because you're already starting with a tuned-in slip angle and now you're forcing the tire to exceed that ideal 6-8 degrees.

So as you get faster you may want to reduce your rear toe-in to aid in car balance in the turns and lose some of the corner exit grip. It's always a trade off.

I know of one past national champion in a Z06 who went with 0 rear toe-in. Others who went with tons. As long as you know what it's doing and are OK with that then fine, enjoy.
Good points, we all have to arrive at what feels best. I like to brake deep and get on the throttle early and hard, so a car that's a little more understeer oriented works for me. Only thing I would add is that the Z06 drivers who I've seen have the greatest success really minimize sliding the car, keeping it very tidy. Also, there's enough deflection in the rear bushings that 1/8" toe in will be pretty much negated off turn/on the gas/full squat.

Also, the bigger front bar suggestion has been done with success by a number of guys, including Braun, Salerno etc. when they ran the Z06. The guy to talk to about that setup is probably Sam Strano @ stranoparts.

BTW, Scott, who ran zero toe?
Old 02-13-2007, 03:32 PM
  #26  
TedDBere
Melting Slicks
 
TedDBere's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Charleston South Carolina
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tigerdrvr

BTW, Scott, who ran zero toe?
I've made it a point these last two years not to discuss other peoples cars and specific setups unless they've made the information public themselves. In this case I don't think it's public so I'll pass on identifying the driver. If he'd like to pipe up he can. I believe Strano helped him with the setup though.

The point being, make changes with a purpose, ie because of the handling of the car, not because everyone else is doing it.

Mike, I thought you moved to BS this year? Can't keep away from the high HP???
Old 02-13-2007, 03:37 PM
  #27  
wtknght1
Melting Slicks
 
wtknght1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Ooltewah TN
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I run virtually zero toe in the back. I like the tires going straight forward which helps eliminate tire scrub down the straights and theoretically should give you the maximum amount of power to the pavement possible. The car seems to handle just fine with that setting too.
Old 02-13-2007, 04:38 PM
  #28  
TommyBoy72
Pro
Thread Starter
 
TommyBoy72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Interesting. I just know from experience that much toe-in on the rear makes the car push, which is correctable on the Z06 on corner exit easily enough but what about turn-in? I ran progressively less toe every year I was in CS and later CSP. I think you guys have helped quite a bit, I have a baseline and will go from there.

That begs the question which front sway bars are options and what shocks? I'm not going to bother with Double adjustables this time around or even custom valving Koni sports I dont think - so that narrows down the shock options a bit.
Old 02-13-2007, 04:58 PM
  #29  
TedDBere
Melting Slicks
 
TedDBere's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Charleston South Carolina
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

The stock bar is pretty good. T1 is too much and the Hotchkis (sp?) is hard to make work well in Autox, but some use them anyway. That leaves you with the Addco 1.25" either hollow or solid. Your driving style and handling characteristics should determine which to go with. Drive the car with the stock 30mm bar for a while and see what you need. If you want some good advice give Sam Strano a call at stranoparts.com.

As far as shocks, if you're not going to upgrade to the DAs or Koni's then stick with the Sach's stock '04s until you feel like shelling out the money. IMHO
Old 02-13-2007, 04:59 PM
  #30  
wtknght1
Melting Slicks
 
wtknght1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Ooltewah TN
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I run virtually no toe in the front or back...for road racing. .01 out in front and .01 in for the back - just enough for stability...maximum straight line speed.

As far as sway bars and shocks, etc. There are 1000000.... options. As I have said before though, the T1 kit is awfully good, tested under fire, bulletproof and really fast! Most of the T1 guys just run the SACHS shocks which were designed for the T1 kit. It works very well. Just bolt it all on, set the correct ride height, cornerweight and alignment, and you'll have a fast car. That set up, if driven correctly, will dust 95%+ of the cars out there.
Old 02-13-2007, 05:04 PM
  #31  
TommyBoy72
Pro
Thread Starter
 
TommyBoy72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Make sense. I was reading about using the C6 Z06 shocks instead of the 04 shocks. Not sure I read a really good comparison of the two but it seems the C6 ones are cheaper if all else is similar.
Old 02-13-2007, 06:24 PM
  #32  
talon95
Pro
 
talon95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TedDBere
The stock bar is pretty good. T1 is too much and the Hotchkis (sp?) is hard to make work well in Autox, but some use them anyway. That leaves you with the Addco 1.25" either hollow or solid. Your driving style and handling characteristics should determine which to go with. Drive the car with the stock 30mm bar for a while and see what you need. If you want some good advice give Sam Strano a call at stranoparts.com.

As far as shocks, if you're not going to upgrade to the DAs or Koni's then stick with the Sach's stock '04s until you feel like shelling out the money. IMHO
Yea, I've got the solid Addco.

Strano likes the Koni's for shocks, I dug up this old post on the SCCAForums. Pretty interesting.

http://sccaforums.com/forums/post/152369.aspx

Dave G.
Old 02-13-2007, 06:29 PM
  #33  
wtknght1
Melting Slicks
 
wtknght1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Ooltewah TN
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TommyBoy72
Make sense. I was reading about using the C6 Z06 shocks instead of the 04 shocks. Not sure I read a really good comparison of the two but it seems the C6 ones are cheaper if all else is similar.
Two completely different cars...two different spring rates...two different suspensions!!
Old 02-13-2007, 06:48 PM
  #34  
TommyBoy72
Pro
Thread Starter
 
TommyBoy72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by talon95
Yea, I've got the solid Addco.

Strano likes the Koni's for shocks, I dug up this old post on the SCCAForums. Pretty interesting.

http://sccaforums.com/forums/post/152369.aspx

Dave G.
Very interesting. For the price, thats tough to beat and I do like Koni's I just didn't want to bother sending them off. I'll shoot Sam an email.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:24 PM
  #35  
JRL
Pro
 
JRL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: san ramon ca
Posts: 545
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

I run the 32mm addco front bar with zero toe in back and it feels good, the car has a good balance and generally does exactly what I want it to do.
I ran a bigger front bar on my Camaro SS per Strano's suggestion, really liked it, so we tried on the Z06. Like M Wood said, its all about finding a comfort and confidence level that suits your driving style and works for you.

John L.
'03 Z06
Old 02-13-2007, 09:07 PM
  #36  
RAFTRACER
Melting Slicks
 
RAFTRACER's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TommyBoy72
Very interesting. For the price, thats tough to beat and I do like Koni's I just didn't want to bother sending them off. I'll shoot Sam an email.
I would call Koni NA directly myself and talk to them, they have new stuff coming if it didn't hit the market yet.. 3013's (as the originals have been) are too long and should be shortened somewhat to be optimal even in SS. Additionally the high gas pressures will raise the car ( which isn't a bad thing if you have the long 3013's) . Talk to Gordon Benson on ext 343 or Jay at 334...

I haven't seen or heard recently, but I believe there is a new 3013 already here or directly around the corner and a new FSD (frequency selective dampening). The new 3013 is supposed to be shorter than previous and I believe a valving revision.
Old 02-13-2007, 09:12 PM
  #37  
TommyBoy72
Pro
Thread Starter
 
TommyBoy72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks RAFT,

So the old 3013 was longer than stock I assume? Does this mean the newer ones are probably stock length to stay stock legal?

off topic, bummer I could never get the 01 I bought to your shop last week thanks to the snow. I've already transported it home now so I have to pray we have a good tech here.

Get notified of new replies

To C5 Z06 SCCA Super Stock Alignment

Old 02-13-2007, 09:18 PM
  #38  
acrace
Drifting
 
acrace's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Livingston County, Michigan
Posts: 1,865
Received 215 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

Two of the four quickest Z06s in Super Stock at the '06 Nationals ran the single adjustable Koni 3013s, although I agree with Raftracer. Lots of gas pressure which raises the car. I tried them and then took them off my car before Nationals last year.

I thought that the "new" single adjustable Konis are also supposed to have the adjuster in an easier to reach position, but that's based on a single conversation over four months ago.

wtknght1 - can't use the complete T1 kit in Solo Super Stock. Shocks are open as well as the front bar. Rear bar needs to be OEM as well as the springs.


Al Chan
03 Z06

Last edited by acrace; 02-13-2007 at 09:23 PM.
Old 02-14-2007, 02:07 AM
  #39  
trackboss
Melting Slicks
 
trackboss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

The new konis are still a few months out according to a distributor I spoke to. Biggest difference I was told is that they will be inverted. Looking myself for dampers and can't really find anything in between some of the low cost factory or factory replacement shocks and the higher end threaded body shocks. I use 3012's on my race car, not a corvette, and they are excellent, but don't want such a high end damper for my corvette as its not a race car. 3013's seem to be the ticket, but feedback I have gotten from someone who is very knowledgable in race car suspensions was not good. Unless of course he was talking about another koni shock for the C5 that I am not aware of. This was over a year ago.
Old 02-14-2007, 05:55 AM
  #40  
rlsedition
Advanced
 
rlsedition's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Based on what I'm reading here, the new 3013s would seem to be just the ticket for your car. We developed them on a C5/ZO6 and C6/Z51 and, like the guys said, they will have inverted bodies, mostly to enable easier adjustment window access.
Price will be $700-750 a set and availability by the end of March.


Quick Reply: C5 Z06 SCCA Super Stock Alignment



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.