Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wheel Allignment Question for Track and Street

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2005, 02:53 PM
  #1  
GR8-LIFE
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
GR8-LIFE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Posts: 55,394
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Wheel Allignment Question for Track and Street

My Car is a street/track combo. For the street I have 18" wheels/tires all around and for the track I have 17" all around

One of the guys I run with has -1.5 camber front and rear but he's also running 18" tires on track and street (I run 17" on track).

Now it does Sound like I would probably benefit from the -1.5 camber but also want to make sure that I have something of a compromise for street and track considering by different size wheel combination. I also need TOE and CASTOR SPEC Suggestions. Typicaly I drive the vette in the street 1-2 days a week.

Also, I was just curious. I can go to 2 shops that have PITS (I prefer PITS because of the lowered car). One shop wants to charge $150 to do this. Money isnt always an issue with me but that does sound like alot of $$$ to do this. Your opinions? Any other suggestions?

TIA
Old 08-18-2005, 04:52 PM
  #2  
tigerdrvr
Pro
 
tigerdrvr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Alamo CA
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Typically, rear camber is between 50-75% of front camber, so if you can get -1.5r, you would want at least -2.0f. Front toe is a matter of preference, most will suggest somewhere in the 1/8" toe out range, I'm a zero effective front toe kind of guy. Rear toe should be in the 1/8-1/4 toe in range. Caster in front is as much as you can get with the camber specs desired.
Old 08-18-2005, 05:21 PM
  #3  
GR8-LIFE
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
GR8-LIFE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Posts: 55,394
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks
Old 08-18-2005, 05:45 PM
  #4  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,078
Received 8,919 Likes on 5,328 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tigerdrvr
Typically, rear camber is between 50-75% of front camber, so if you can get -1.5r, you would want at least -2.0f. Front toe is a matter of preference, most will suggest somewhere in the 1/8" toe out range, I'm a zero effective front toe kind of guy. Rear toe should be in the 1/8-1/4 toe in range. Caster in front is as much as you can get with the camber specs desired.


However when I did my setup on my 97 I added just a little toe in on the front to try and keep the car from wandering on the street. With the run flats the car would wander all over the place with toe out or zero toe. Once I had just a little toe in added it seemed to behave a lot better. With my Z06 I decided to stay with the stock settings (still with a little front toe in) since the high camber settings really caused a lot of tire wear.
Bill
Old 08-18-2005, 06:13 PM
  #5  
C5GARY
Racer
 
C5GARY's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by tigerdrvr
Typically, rear camber is between 50-75% of front camber, so if you can get -1.5r, you would want at least -2.0f. Front toe is a matter of preference, most will suggest somewhere in the 1/8" toe out range, I'm a zero effective front toe kind of guy. Rear toe should be in the 1/8-1/4 toe in range. Caster in front is as much as you can get with the camber specs desired.
Probably a dumb question, but can you explain what the rear toe in is for? Preferred stock setting is a touch of toe out if I am not mistaken. The theorys I have read say that when the car is under power, the rear wheels will "pull" to a more positive toe, hence, you should have a static negative toe. 1/4 toe sounds like a lot...

Also, does TIGERdrvr by any chance refer to a Sunbeam Tiger? I have 2 of those!
Gary
Old 08-18-2005, 06:32 PM
  #6  
GR8-LIFE
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
GR8-LIFE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Posts: 55,394
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by C5GARY
Probably a dumb question, but can you explain what the rear toe in is for? Preferred stock setting is a touch of toe out if I am not mistaken. The theorys I have read say that when the car is under power, the rear wheels will "pull" to a more positive toe, hence, you should have a static negative toe. 1/4 toe sounds like a lot...

Also, does TIGERdrvr by any chance refer to a Sunbeam Tiger? I have 2 of those!
Gary
I have heard 0-1/16 toe out for the rear and
0-1/16 in for the front
Old 08-18-2005, 06:51 PM
  #7  
tigerdrvr
Pro
 
tigerdrvr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Alamo CA
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C5GARY
Probably a dumb question, but can you explain what the rear toe in is for? Preferred stock setting is a touch of toe out if I am not mistaken. The theorys I have read say that when the car is under power, the rear wheels will "pull" to a more positive toe, hence, you should have a static negative toe. 1/4 toe sounds like a lot...

Also, does TIGERdrvr by any chance refer to a Sunbeam Tiger? I have 2 of those!
Gary

Yep, rear toe in helps with off corner, forward bite. Depending on course condition (autocrossing), you may want as much as 1/4"...I've known some to run even more (not sure why). I'm at 1/8" and my car hooks well, with -1.0r camber and ride height almost as low as possible (still have 3 threads showing above). Front ride height is set to give right at 3/8" rake, so the front is higher than some might run. It does work very well, with -2.0f camber and zero toe. A little toe in is good for directional stability, but tends to hurt turn in. Also, toe is the killer of tires, more so than camber. I've gotten away with up to -1.5f camber on cars with no real impact on tire wear.

And, yep, tigerdrvr does refer to Sunbeam Tiger. I've had one that I've used for autocross, open track, and other fun uses for the last 15 years. Right now its on a rotisserie in the garage, as I've started the full restoration it deserves...
Old 08-19-2005, 10:30 AM
  #8  
Too Tall Bob
Racer
 
Too Tall Bob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Welcome to Club Cranky. Now get outta here!
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just had my Z06 alignment settings set for the track at -2.1 in frt. with as much caster as possible, and quite honsetly, my first comment to the alignment guy was how much more stable the car felt in a straight line than it did before with the OEM settings. I have 1/8" toe-out on the front as well.
Old 08-19-2005, 08:46 PM
  #9  
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
 
glass slipper's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,309
Received 394 Likes on 188 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MARK's_C5TT
Also, I was just curious. I can go to 2 shops that have PITS (I prefer PITS because of the lowered car). One shop wants to charge $150 to do this. Money isnt always an issue with me but that does sound like alot of $$$ to do this. Your opinions? Any other suggestions?
TIA
I do alignments myself using very simple tools, that way I know it's done right (and exactly what it is) and can change it myself as much as I want even at the track. Once you become familiar with your suspension and how much difference a given adjustment makes, you'll find yourself crawling under it to tweak a little here and a little there. I have done this for other guys DURING an event and watch them go out and take 2+ seconds off their time. Having a C4 gives me the benefit of returning the front camber/toe to "street" specs very quickly (10 minutes) before I leave the track meaning I have zero compromise on my track alignment.
...To get the numbers we're looking for $150 is not really a lot considering the time it takes. Remember their $59.99 alignment for most cars is because most cars don't need adjustment or just a small tweak. So that $59.99 alignment is really a $59.99 alignment CHECK that doesn't require a lot of time.

Last edited by glass slipper; 08-19-2005 at 08:50 PM.
Old 08-19-2005, 09:03 PM
  #10  
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
 
glass slipper's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,309
Received 394 Likes on 188 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tigerdrvr
Front toe is a matter of preference, most will suggest somewhere in the 1/8" toe out range, I'm a zero effective front toe kind of guy.
Excellent suggestions, especially the front toe. Once I set camber for best grip/wear, I use the front toe to tune the car to the track. At low speed events I use more toe out to get the turn-in and help the car rotate (makes the rear-end "loose"). I have the skill level to handle the rear loose at low speeds and it's fun . Of course high speed events get less toe out to add stability on the straights at high speed and prevent the rear-end from being "loose" on those high speed turns. I'm nowhere close to the skill level required to handle a loose rear at high speed. A man has got to know his limitations!

Get notified of new replies

To Wheel Allignment Question for Track and Street




Quick Reply: Wheel Allignment Question for Track and Street



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.