12" ED12O.44 and IDQ question

mike76002 · 09-23-2004, 02:42 PM

Has anyone listened to both of these 2 subs?
Which one do you like better?
I got C5 vert and actually looking for a light sub that play loud and tight.
I know IDQ looks much lighter than the ED12O (original version).
BTW, I got 0.8 cu ft sub box.
Thanks,
-Mike

leolufse · 09-24-2004, 10:50 AM

I had an e10o in a .7 sealed box with 500 watts. It was the best sounding sub I've ever heard. Tight, musical, and went incredibly low for 10" sub. It would be tough to compare these subs you mentioned. There are many factors involved including musical tastes, amp power, head unit, etc.

mike76002 · 09-25-2004, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leolufse

I had an e10o in a .7 sealed box with 500 watts. It was the best sounding sub I've ever heard. Tight, musical, and went incredibly low for 10" sub. It would be tough to compare these subs you mentioned. There are many factors involved including musical tastes, amp power, head unit, etc.

Lars,
I love clean and tight bass. I got 1200.1 JBL amp and Alpine death HU.
I will give the ED sub a try first.
Are you still making sub boxes?
I have stop making those for couple months after married and not planning to do it again. I'm retired making sub boxes

So what sub are you using now?
Do you think the ED12O will be around 25 lbs?
Thanks,
-Mike

leolufse · 09-27-2004, 02:37 PM

Sent PM.