C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Dana 36 ID ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2014, 06:15 PM
  #1  
Wayne Meuir
7th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Wayne Meuir's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Lavon Texas
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dana 36 ID ?

Is there a way to determine what year a Dana 36 rear is? I bought one that I am going to install in a 57 Chevy 2 Door. The seller said it is from a 96 Base Model Vette with Auto Tranny. I did not get the spring or the toe rods(long story--I got stiffed by the guy). It is complete otherwise. It has Parking brake in caliper, not drum parking brake. Based on that and what searches I did here, I think it has to be an 88+, but I really don't know how to tell.

Is there a way to tell, or does it really matter?.

Wayne
Old 01-10-2014, 08:03 PM
  #2  
vetteoz
Safety Car
 
vetteoz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,556
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wayne Meuir
Is there a way to determine what year a Dana 36 rear is?
Look underneath the head


Old 01-10-2014, 09:53 PM
  #3  
WVZR-1
Team Owner

 
WVZR-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,050
Received 2,254 Likes on 2,017 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vetteoz
Look underneath the head


Most D44's display that information but likely not a D36. The last 2 D36's that I've had didn't have the information on the differentials. A third empty housing doesn't either.

OP - If it's on the ground you can get all of the information from the ring gear and there's a good chance that there could be a date code on it that could help. The ratio for sure could be confirmed from that information. Does it matter? I'd think maybe. Various aspects of the rear could have labels that could be date coded. The half-shafts should be labeled and matching maybe that information to the ring gear information a person could "assume" it's age.

If it's for a project depending on maybe it's physical appearance a person could do bearings and seals and call it good.
Old 01-10-2014, 10:24 PM
  #4  
Wayne Meuir
7th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Wayne Meuir's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Lavon Texas
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The whole assembly is really clean. I plan on putting a new pinion seal, both output seals and all new Polygraphite bushings on it. It is supposed to be a 3.07 ratio, but I have not pulled the cover off yet. It was all disassembled when I got it and the guy I bought it from still owes me the spring and the toe rod assembly, and now he will not return my calls. I am 67 years old and trust people to honor their word. Maybe I'll learn some day but I doubt it. I don't know what spring it had in it, but if it really is a 96, it is probably pretty soft. Surprisingly, and 57 Chevy sedan is only about 400 lbs heavier than a stock C4 Vette.

I am having a stock 57 frame converted to accept both front and rear c4 suspension by a guy in Ft Collins, Colorado that has done over 40 of these conversions. I will only be able to get a 275 tire on the rear on a 9.0 or 9.5 inch wheel and plan to run 245's on the front on and 8.5 inch wheel.
Thanks for the info. I will pull the cover off and see what the ring/pinion look like.

I am considering finding an LS motor to put in it. My car currently has the original 283 and an M20 Muncie 4 speed.

Wayne

Last edited by Wayne Meuir; 01-10-2014 at 10:26 PM.
Old 01-10-2014, 10:57 PM
  #5  
WVZR-1
Team Owner

 
WVZR-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,050
Received 2,254 Likes on 2,017 Posts

Default

Remove the cover and let's see what the ring gear information confirms. The 3 seals if it's clean on the inside might just do.

Seldom when conversions are done is the transverse spring used - this fellow uses the transverse spring? If it's actually a '96 and a 3.07 it's likely that it also had a suspension option and the spring might be a "comfortable" option. When you get the spring the spring will have a letter code molded in it. That's easy to document.
Old 01-10-2014, 11:16 PM
  #6  
Wayne Meuir
7th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Wayne Meuir's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Lavon Texas
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea, I need to get the cover off. It may be smarter to put new bearings in it while it is apart. It feels really smooth when you spin it by hand. I don't think I am going to get the stock spring because the guy I bought it from will not answer my e-mails or phone messages. I am assuming that I just got stiffed by the guy. My BAD!

Yea, the guy who does this conversion actually puts shock mount brackets on both the front and rear so that coil-overs can be used, but his opinion, after doing over 40 of these is that the transverse spring works just as good and saves about $1000-1500 that you would have to spend on mid priced coil overs. He recommends trying the transverse spring first and if you can find a spring rate that works well, use it, if not, simply remove the transverse spring and install coil-overs.

Wayne
Old 01-10-2014, 11:31 PM
  #7  
WVZR-1
Team Owner

 
WVZR-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,050
Received 2,254 Likes on 2,017 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wayne Meuir
Yea, I need to get the cover off. It may be smarter to put new bearings in it while it is apart. It feels really smooth when you spin it by hand. I don't think I am going to get the stock spring because the guy I bought it from will not answer my e-mails or phone messages. I am assuming that I just got stiffed by the guy. My BAD!

Yea, the guy who does this conversion actually puts shock mount brackets on both the front and rear so that coil-overs can be used, but his opinion, after doing over 40 of these is that the transverse spring works just as good and saves about $1000-1500 that you would have to spend on mid priced coil overs. He recommends trying the transverse spring first and if you can find a spring rate that works well, use it, if not, simply remove the transverse spring and install coil-overs.

Wayne
I have a couple springs that might do for you. One is an '84 that is pretty damned stout and the other is from a later build ZR-1. Either would work, dimensionally they're the same. Both are in very good shape. When you inspect the innards of the D36 you can determine likely the miles from ring gear wear.

Is the car a "roller" now or maybe drive-able? You might consider just going ahead and scaling it before you start. Front and rear weights, then you can just compare what's removed vs. what's going to be used.
Old 01-11-2014, 01:51 AM
  #8  
ccpanel
Advanced
 
ccpanel's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: chico CA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What's the heaviest spring version?
Year?
Model?
Old 01-11-2014, 07:26 AM
  #9  
WVZR-1
Team Owner

 
WVZR-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,050
Received 2,254 Likes on 2,017 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ccpanel
What's the heaviest spring version?
Year?
Model?
BMH Code (87.5 N/mm = 499.975/lbf/in)

1984

Z51

That's for the rear and since the OP had mentioned rear I assumed that was your interest. The rear will do all years '84 - '96

Heaviest front '88 - '90 Z51, '91 Z07 BUT will only do '88+ suspension builds using '88+ components. FHB code (115.5 N/mm = 659.967 lbf/in)

Heaviest front for '84 - '87 suspension builds using earlier components '84 Z51 BMB code (102 N/mm = 582.828 lbf/in)
Old 01-11-2014, 02:21 PM
  #10  
ccpanel
Advanced
 
ccpanel's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: chico CA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WVZR-1
BMH Code (87.5 N/mm = 499.975/lbf/in)

1984

Z51

That's for the rear and since the OP had mentioned rear I assumed that was your interest. The rear will do all years '84 - '96

Heaviest front '88 - '90 Z51, '91 Z07 BUT will only do '88+ suspension builds using '88+ components. FHB code (115.5 N/mm = 659.967 lbf/in)

Heaviest front for '84 - '87 suspension builds using earlier components '84 Z51 BMB code (102 N/mm = 582.828 lbf/in)
thank you very much-super helpful.
and since my rig is about 1800 in the rear it should wokr great.
Old 01-11-2014, 02:31 PM
  #11  
aboatguy
Race Director
 
aboatguy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Slidell Louisiana
Posts: 10,641
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

My D36 had the date engraved on the bottom of the diff
Old 01-11-2014, 04:36 PM
  #12  
Wayne Meuir
7th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Wayne Meuir's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Lavon Texas
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine has no marking of any kind on it. Still have not taken the cover off, probably won't get to that until Monday.

The 57 Sedan I have is complete and running, but I have all the interior out in preparation for moving the body to the new frame.
I think the 57 weighs about 3800 lbs. compared to the C4 at 3300-3400, so the 96 Spring may be little soft.

The guy who is doing the frame is putting late C4 front Suspension in it.

Here is the only pic of the car that I have right now.
http://s126.photobucket.com/user/way...tml?sort=3&o=0

Last edited by Wayne Meuir; 01-11-2014 at 04:45 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To Dana 36 ID ?




Quick Reply: Dana 36 ID ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 AM.