C7 Navigation System
05-21-2013, 11:44 AM
#2
Safety Car
The displays are greatly improved, all high def (720 p). The 8" one in the center is much brighter, 1000 NIT (unit of brightness), the 8" one in front of the driver is 650 NIT -- compared to a brand new iPhone or IPad with retinal display which is 500 NIT.
The one in the center is touchscreen, "gestive," again like an iPhone or iPad. Even the HUD (available on the 2LT and 3 LT interiors) is now color, also 720 p.
The one in the center is touchscreen, "gestive," again like an iPhone or iPad. Even the HUD (available on the 2LT and 3 LT interiors) is now color, also 720 p.
05-21-2013, 11:59 AM
#3
Le Mans Master
The C7 nav display is much brighter and more detailed than the C6. In all fairness the C6 display should have been replaced with a newer unit midway in its run. This is generally the biggest problem with in-dash nav systems. It is very likely the C7 nav system software and display technology will start to look very old in a few years as well. However GM wil most likely keep the same unit no matter how obsolete it looks throughout the C7 model run. As was explained to me by a GM executive "we build cars not electronics".
05-21-2013, 05:02 PM
#4
Racer
When I bought my C6 I ordered it with the nav. It has been on 3-4 times in 3 years! I got it only for the re-sale value...hoping that the next buyer didn't know anything about the Corvette nav system! I am sure I get some giggles when someone walks by the Vert, and sees my Garmin sitting on the dash above the nav system.
I will be getting the nav in my C7, and hopefully, not just for the re-sale this time!
I will be getting the nav in my C7, and hopefully, not just for the re-sale this time!
05-21-2013, 05:32 PM
#5
Drifting
05-21-2013, 06:01 PM
#7
AIR FORCE VETERAN
I watched YouTube videos on the 2013 Cadiliac CUE system. They are very good and I think show what we will see in the new Stingray. I could post a link if some would like that.
05-21-2013, 06:07 PM
#8
Safety Car
We will not be getting a version of Cadillac QUE, but the latest version of MyLink.
05-21-2013, 06:12 PM
#9
AIR FORCE VETERAN
www.motorauthority.com › News › Car Tech
by Nelson Ireson - in 260 Google+ circles
Feb 6, 2013 – As innovative as Cadillac's CUE touch-based infotainment interface is, it has met with widespread criticism--including our own. But Cadillac is ...
Whatever you want to call it they are both the same. Just google the system and you can see they are alike..
05-21-2013, 06:16 PM
#10
AIR FORCE VETERAN
Including the little hidden compartment
► 6:06► 6:06
www.youtube.com/watch?v=62u7rjjn1Ro
Oct 12, 2011 - Uploaded by geekbeattv
Cadillac gave us a sneak peak at their new CUE system. It stands for Cadillac User ...
► 6:06► 6:06
www.youtube.com/watch?v=62u7rjjn1Ro
Oct 12, 2011 - Uploaded by geekbeattv
Cadillac gave us a sneak peak at their new CUE system. It stands for Cadillac User ...
05-21-2013, 07:05 PM
#11
Instructor
Member Since: May 2012
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That kind of reasoning will put Chevy in last place very quickly. The World has changed and you either change with it or get left behind.
Nav will become standard in five years on ALL cars. The manufacturers are cleaning up while they can. Remember when AC was an option most passed on? I recall roll up windows and a drivers side only mirror. Before that radios and heaters were optional.
Time marches on.
Nav will become standard in five years on ALL cars. The manufacturers are cleaning up while they can. Remember when AC was an option most passed on? I recall roll up windows and a drivers side only mirror. Before that radios and heaters were optional.
Time marches on.
05-21-2013, 07:43 PM
#12
Successful Plumber
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Top of the hill, 3rd mailbox on the right. Texas
Posts: 43,830
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
6 Posts
CF NCM Ambassador
CI 6-7-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10
NCM Member '09
GM doesn't need to build electronics.
But they need to build an open ended, standardized data bus into the infrastructure of the car so that those electronics can be upgraded through the run of the model.
But they need to build an open ended, standardized data bus into the infrastructure of the car so that those electronics can be upgraded through the run of the model.
05-21-2013, 08:03 PM
#13
Team Owner
The new navigation system (integration with the infotainment system, features and capabilities), the old system isn't even in the same league.
I've seen the system and it is "blow you away" capable.
I'll be giving a seminar at the NCM for the Labor Day event on the complete infotainment system and it's capabilities and integration.
I've seen the system and it is "blow you away" capable.
I'll be giving a seminar at the NCM for the Labor Day event on the complete infotainment system and it's capabilities and integration.
05-21-2013, 08:21 PM
#14
The new navigation system (integration with the infotainment system, features and capabilities), the old system isn't even in the same league.
I've seen the system and it is "blow you away" capable.
I'll be giving a seminar at the NCM for the Labor Day event on the complete infotainment system and it's capabilities and integration.
I've seen the system and it is "blow you away" capable.
I'll be giving a seminar at the NCM for the Labor Day event on the complete infotainment system and it's capabilities and integration.
05-21-2013, 08:21 PM
#15
Team Owner
There is a lot of information in this thread and some of it is even accurate.
The much maligned navigation unit in the sixth generation Corvette was a very capable navigation system for it's day (developed in 2003) even up until the end. Trust me, the list of folks that know the operation of it in total better than I do isn't all that long. Take a look at what Garmin was offering in 2003 for comparison. Within Corvette, the unit was slated for replacement with the 2008 and again for the 2009 model year but the downturn and sales prevented that from happening. Unfortunately, a car like the Corvette (particularly the sixth generation) has significant integration of the systems. The Corvette architecture was an island among The GM fleet and as such, a different unit couldn't just be swapped in, it needed to be designed in and there was no money in the program for that when the SA.es went soft. Further problems with contractual obligations with the supplier prevented a mid-life upgrade. Denso had a unit that could have worked but they saved particular hardware for their bread and butter platforms and wouldn't work with GM for the Corvette to make the upgrade.
Because of this significant integration, once the platform gets set, it isn't very easy to change.
The much maligned navigation unit in the sixth generation Corvette was a very capable navigation system for it's day (developed in 2003) even up until the end. Trust me, the list of folks that know the operation of it in total better than I do isn't all that long. Take a look at what Garmin was offering in 2003 for comparison. Within Corvette, the unit was slated for replacement with the 2008 and again for the 2009 model year but the downturn and sales prevented that from happening. Unfortunately, a car like the Corvette (particularly the sixth generation) has significant integration of the systems. The Corvette architecture was an island among The GM fleet and as such, a different unit couldn't just be swapped in, it needed to be designed in and there was no money in the program for that when the SA.es went soft. Further problems with contractual obligations with the supplier prevented a mid-life upgrade. Denso had a unit that could have worked but they saved particular hardware for their bread and butter platforms and wouldn't work with GM for the Corvette to make the upgrade.
Because of this significant integration, once the platform gets set, it isn't very easy to change.
05-21-2013, 11:50 PM
#18
Le Mans Master
There is a lot of information in this thread and some of it is even accurate.
The much maligned navigation unit in the sixth generation Corvette was a very capable navigation system for it's day (developed in 2003) even up until the end. Trust me, the list of folks that know the operation of it in total better than I do isn't all that long. Take a look at what Garmin was offering in 2003 for comparison. Within Corvette, the unit was slated for replacement with the 2008 and again for the 2009 model year but the downturn and sales prevented that from happening. Unfortunately, a car like the Corvette (particularly the sixth generation) has significant integration of the systems. The Corvette architecture was an island among The GM fleet and as such, a different unit couldn't just be swapped in, it needed to be designed in and there was no money in the program for that when the SA.es went soft. Further problems with contractual obligations with the supplier prevented a mid-life upgrade. Denso had a unit that could have worked but they saved particular hardware for their bread and butter platforms and wouldn't work with GM for the Corvette to make the upgrade.
Because of this significant integration, once the platform gets set, it isn't very easy to change.
The much maligned navigation unit in the sixth generation Corvette was a very capable navigation system for it's day (developed in 2003) even up until the end. Trust me, the list of folks that know the operation of it in total better than I do isn't all that long. Take a look at what Garmin was offering in 2003 for comparison. Within Corvette, the unit was slated for replacement with the 2008 and again for the 2009 model year but the downturn and sales prevented that from happening. Unfortunately, a car like the Corvette (particularly the sixth generation) has significant integration of the systems. The Corvette architecture was an island among The GM fleet and as such, a different unit couldn't just be swapped in, it needed to be designed in and there was no money in the program for that when the SA.es went soft. Further problems with contractual obligations with the supplier prevented a mid-life upgrade. Denso had a unit that could have worked but they saved particular hardware for their bread and butter platforms and wouldn't work with GM for the Corvette to make the upgrade.
Because of this significant integration, once the platform gets set, it isn't very easy to change.
05-22-2013, 12:12 AM
#19
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Do you upgrade your whole computer everytime you upgrade your browser or office suite?
The software can always be upgraded and improved upon without hardware changes. Take my word on this. It's not the integration of the hardware that limits manufacturers from updating your infotainment systems. It's the incentive to upgrade your car to a new car that keeps them from updating your old car.
The software can always be upgraded and improved upon without hardware changes. Take my word on this. It's not the integration of the hardware that limits manufacturers from updating your infotainment systems. It's the incentive to upgrade your car to a new car that keeps them from updating your old car.
05-22-2013, 12:25 AM
#20
Le Mans Master
Do you upgrade your whole computer everytime you upgrade your browser or office suite?
The software can always be upgraded and improved upon without hardware changes. Take my word on this. It's not the integration of the hardware that limits manufacturers from updating your infotainment systems. It's the incentive to upgrade your car to a new car that keeps them from updating your old car.
The software can always be upgraded and improved upon without hardware changes. Take my word on this. It's not the integration of the hardware that limits manufacturers from updating your infotainment systems. It's the incentive to upgrade your car to a new car that keeps them from updating your old car.
