C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C7 Mule Drivetrain Photos

Old 08-01-2011, 10:14 PM
  #1  
Senna1994
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Senna1994's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 492
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts

Default C7 Mule Drivetrain Photos

Guys, did you see this today posted in Left Lane News. It was also on Brenda Priddy's site.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrole...ette-2014.html
Old 08-01-2011, 10:24 PM
  #2  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Hmmm... Interesting... What's more interesting to me is that the wheels are tucked.
Old 08-01-2011, 10:27 PM
  #3  
BluegrassMotorsport
Melting Slicks
 
BluegrassMotorsport's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,290
Received 883 Likes on 478 Posts

Default

Finally! A mule! Progress!
Old 08-01-2011, 11:29 PM
  #4  
ivanjo11
Burning Brakes
 
ivanjo11's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FERRARI LIKE SOUND ENGINE
Old 08-02-2011, 02:48 AM
  #5  
VETTE-NV
16 Vettes and counting…..
Support Corvetteforum!
 
VETTE-NV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,821
Received 1,139 Likes on 540 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SCM_Crash
Hmmm... Interesting... What's more interesting to me is that the wheels are tucked.
They're probably close to the width of standard C6....that's a wider GS body.
Old 08-02-2011, 06:45 AM
  #6  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VETTE-NV
They're probably close to the width of standard C6....that's a wider GS body.
Yeah. That's true. Didn't think about that.
Old 08-02-2011, 07:05 AM
  #7  
Kingsize
Racer
 
Kingsize's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Mont Belvieu Texas
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hmmm... Good to see they are staying with the standard layout with the drivetrain.
Old 08-02-2011, 07:45 AM
  #8  
JerriVette
Race Director
 
JerriVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Bergen county NJ
Posts: 15,822
Received 3,947 Likes on 2,177 Posts

Default

If GM had used a base body nobody would even known it was a test mile.

Thanks for the heads up yet this is clearly GM poking fun and just creating press specilation
Old 08-02-2011, 06:49 PM
  #9  
BuckyThreadkiller
Successful Plumber
Support Corvetteforum!
 
BuckyThreadkiller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Top of the hill, 3rd mailbox on the right. Texas
Posts: 43,830
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
CF NCM Ambassador
CI 6-7-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10
NCM Member '09

Default

Originally Posted by SCM_Crash
Hmmm... Interesting... What's more interesting to me is that the wheels are tucked.
Why would they put a narrower chassis under GS bodywork? Why not just use a base coupe?
Old 08-02-2011, 07:17 PM
  #10  
JQuest54
Advanced
 
JQuest54's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Maybe

Originally Posted by BuckyThreadkiller
Why would they put a narrower chassis under GS bodywork? Why not just use a base coupe?



The only things I can think of are the fact that they get a dry sump to test with. I wonder what a grandsport would look like with the offset of regular coupe wheels?

Smaller is cooler though imo. I like the C3's size.
Old 08-02-2011, 07:23 PM
  #11  
zland
Drifting
 
zland's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Oceanside Ca
Posts: 1,264
Received 607 Likes on 190 Posts

Default

This makes sense considering the top brass at GM felt the rear end of the current C6 was too big/wide. I am not sure if I agree depending on what they come up with.
Old 08-02-2011, 08:05 PM
  #12  
Kingsize
Racer
 
Kingsize's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Mont Belvieu Texas
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

After looking at these pics more, I am wondering if this chassis is only for the benefit of testing, developing, and recording the sound of the new engine only. I can't see any change as far as suspension or brakes, and I think the wheels are just there to throw people off. There are what looks to be sound recorders on both ends of the quad tips. Wish they had a video with the exhaust note.
Old 08-02-2011, 10:12 PM
  #13  
Garrett W
Melting Slicks
 
Garrett W's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Holly Ridge North Carolina
Posts: 3,167
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Now we are FINALLY getting somewhere... I dont know if I like how it is going to be narrower than the current. I love the wide low stance. Also what they said about the 5.5L exhaust note was interesting. One thing I thought was the only good thing to me was the fact that it looked like they were trying to hide side exhaust with blue tape, or maybe just faking it, but how cool would side exhaust be with a rear diffuser !!
Old 08-02-2011, 10:42 PM
  #14  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Honestly, narrower would be better to me. I can't tell you how many times I park in a parking spot and the door can hardly open without hitting the car next to me. I purposely park in the far back of a parking lot (and sometimes on the roof where nobody else parks) so that I don't have to deal with others, but sometimes that's not an option. Even when I park FAR from people, there's usually some schmuck that parks right next to me even though there's 100 empty spots around me.

That being said, a narrower car would likely yield an easier time getting in and out of the car when parked next to other cars or close walls.
Old 08-02-2011, 11:17 PM
  #15  
vant
Burning Brakes
 
vant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yes, that does make sense. GM will be able to sell the same car to the same buyer twice...initially as the narrow body version, and then again a few years later with fender flares.

Brilliant!
Old 08-03-2011, 12:27 AM
  #16  
ZL-1
Safety Car
 
ZL-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: IL / FL .
Posts: 4,084
Received 184 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redvette77
Finally! A mule! Progress!

We've been expecting that Brenda would come up with one and sure enough she did!
Look for those 14 spoke wheels to be the 2014 production wheel
Old 08-03-2011, 11:59 AM
  #17  
Dudeurgettnavette
Melting Slicks
 
Dudeurgettnavette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ivanjo11
FERRARI LIKE SOUND ENGINE
Buy a Ferrari!!!

Get notified of new replies

To C7 Mule Drivetrain Photos

Old 08-03-2011, 01:44 PM
  #18  
JQuest54
Advanced
 
JQuest54's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Garrett SNA
Now we are FINALLY getting somewhere... I dont know if I like how it is going to be narrower than the current. I love the wide low stance. Also what they said about the 5.5L exhaust note was interesting. One thing I thought was the only good thing to me was the fact that it looked like they were trying to hide side exhaust with blue tape, or maybe just faking it, but how cool would side exhaust be with a rear diffuser !!

Remember this car is to be sold throughout the world. I lived in the UK for four years and having a wide car there can be quite an experience. Parking, roads, and bridges become much more of an issue with a wide car. My C5 was next to impossible to drive in the countryside on some of the B roads. I wouldn't even think about taking it into London, park and tube it in.

They can narrow the car while making the roofline lower. This would make the proportions the same and give it the wide feel again. The problem will be for the fatter buyers out there. The car will shrink, so should they.
Old 08-03-2011, 02:11 PM
  #19  
petermj
Le Mans Master
 
petermj's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zland
This makes sense considering the top brass at GM felt the rear end of the current C6 was too big/wide. I am not sure if I agree depending on what they come up with.
then it will end up like this new aweful camaro with a tiny behind... They should make it wider and stop tucking it in at the bottom, all around the car.
Old 08-03-2011, 02:15 PM
  #20  
petermj
Le Mans Master
 
petermj's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JQuest54
Remember this car is to be sold throughout the world. I lived in the UK for four years and having a wide car there can be quite an experience. Parking, roads, and bridges become much more of an issue with a wide car. My C5 was next to impossible to drive in the countryside on some of the B roads. I wouldn't even think about taking it into London, park and tube it in.

They can narrow the car while making the roofline lower. This would make the proportions the same and give it the wide feel again. The problem will be for the fatter buyers out there. The car will shrink, so should they.
punishing the states with narrower car because of european constraints sounds super dumb but then again, this is GM. European brands like Ferrari and Lambo do not seem to care, is GM going to market the vette in Europe as a groceries getter and commuter car? why not just slap vette emblems on a smart car? Even current widebody ain't wide enough.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: C7 Mule Drivetrain Photos



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.