C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1969 350 300hp

Old 03-07-2006, 11:56 PM
  #1  
kodaclr
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
kodaclr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 1969 350 300hp Differance?

I have a question I hope doesnt sound to dumb. I am a novice at this engine stuff. Can someone explane something to me?

Back in 1969 Chevy had offered a 300hp 350 in the corvettes, they also offered a 350hp 350, What was the differance between the 2 what changes did they do to get 350hp.

Thanks and I hope this isnt to dumb of a question.

Last edited by kodaclr; 03-08-2006 at 12:23 AM.
kodaclr is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 12:09 AM
  #2  
bobs77vet
Race Director
 
bobs77vet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
Posts: 11,863
Received 255 Likes on 225 Posts

Default

i'm not sure, but two popular heads back then were the camel or double hump heads or fuellie heads and they had two different valve sizes so my guess is the more powerful one used the big valve, probalby a different cam and maybe even a different compression ratio....
bobs77vet is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 01:55 AM
  #3  
Oldguard 7
Melting Slicks
 
Oldguard 7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kodaclr
I have a question I hope doesnt sound to dumb. I am a novice at this engine stuff. Can someone explane something to me?

Back in 1969 Chevy had offered a 300hp 350 in the corvettes, they also offered a 350hp 350, What was the differance between the 2 what changes did they do to get 350hp.

Thanks and I hope this isnt to dumb of a question.
The 350-350 engine used domed pistons and a compression ratio of 11.00:1 with solid lifters

The 350-300 engine used flat top pistons and had a compression ratio of 10.25:1 with hydraulic lifters

Last edited by Oldguard 7; 03-08-2006 at 04:35 AM.
Oldguard 7 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 03:17 AM
  #4  
johnnybrewmeister
Racer
 
johnnybrewmeister's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: san diego ca
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kodaclr
I have a question I hope doesnt sound to dumb. I am a novice at this engine stuff. Can someone explane something to me?

Back in 1969 Chevy had offered a 300hp 350 in the corvettes, they also offered a 350hp 350, What was the differance between the 2 what changes did they do to get 350hp.

Thanks and I hope this isnt to dumb of a question.
I've wondered much the same thing, but on a broader scale:
From 68-73 (the last year I care about, since I own a 73!) the 350 engine went thru HP reductions each year. Basically the same engine but with different mods to reduce HP and I'm guessing reduce smog. But what was really done, and can those changes be reverse-engineered? Or would it be smarter/cheaper to just start fresh with a new crate engine with more HP?
What would it take for a wimpy ol' 73 small block to act like a late 60's small block?
johnnybrewmeister is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 04:28 AM
  #5  
Oldguard 7
Melting Slicks
 
Oldguard 7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=johnnybrewmeister]I've wondered much the same thing, but on a broader scale:
From 68-73 (the last year I care about, since I own a 73!) the 350 engine went thru HP reductions each year. Basically the same engine but with different mods to reduce HP and I'm guessing reduce smog. But what was really done, and can those changes be reverse-engineered? Or would it be smarter/cheaper to just start fresh with a new crate engine with more HP?
What would it take for a wimpy ol' 73 small block to act like a late 60's small block?[/QUOTE

In my opinion 1970 was the peak year for the small block engine. The LT-1 engine had 370 gross hp (gross-engine being tested for output without accessories) It was an improvement of the 350-350 engine by using a more radical cam, transistorized ignition, 850cfm carb
a high rise intake along with solid lifters. This engine was a monster in it's day!!!!

To tone down HP GM cylinder heads with a larger chamaber volume (thus lowering the compression ratio) to allow the vettes to run on unleaded feul. On paper, GM began using net HP ratings (net-engine tested for output with accessories) the The 73 in it's stock configuration still had some pep but not as much as the small block vettes of the late 60's-1971(my pick for the last of the high performance vettes of this generation)

To answer the last part of the question, good cylinder heads, a nice cam, and a good ignition system and what your money can afford. Hope this helps.

Last edited by Oldguard 7; 03-08-2006 at 04:33 AM.
Oldguard 7 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 06:50 AM
  #6  
Gordonm
Race Director
 
Gordonm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Forked River NJ
Posts: 19,592
Received 754 Likes on 464 Posts

Default

The 350 Hp engine used a little bit more cam than the 300 HP motor. It was a Hyd. cam not a solid cam. It used 11 to 1 domed pistons vs the 10.25 to 1 in the 300 motor. . The only solid lifter cam in a SB C3 was in the LT1 motors. The LT1 motors used a 780 vacuum secondary Holley not an 850.
Gordonm is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 08:10 AM
  #7  
kodaclr
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
kodaclr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks everyone, I'm just trying to get educated on the C3 and a little on the history of the small block. I appreciate all the input. Thanks again.
kodaclr is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 08:41 AM
  #8  
Tonys96
Drifting
 
Tonys96's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Rosemount MN
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Oldguard 7
... to allow the vettes to run on unleaded feul. ...
Tetra-Ethyl Lead was being phased out and catalytic converters were being phased in during these years.

There weren't sophisticated enough engine management systems available to deal with the onset of detonation, so the manufacturers were forced to drop compression ratios as the octane of the available fuel dropped to provide any measure of reliability.

Since that time, knock sensors and computing power of engine management systems have been developed, witness the LS-7, 505 HP Net.

Fuels have also become more engine friendly, gone are the days of 104 Octane at the local Sunoco, but the new 91-93 octanes are remarkably engineered and clean, capable of supporting around 10.5:1 Compression Ratio.
Tonys96 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 09:11 AM
  #9  
audiec
Instructor
 
audiec's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Belton Missouri
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You can duplicate (+\- some) the specs of the 350hp engine by adding better heads and cam.

Converting your flat top piston 350 to Vortec L31 heads (PN: 12558060) and the L46\L82 Cam (PN: 3896962) will get you close.

Compression will be close to 10.25:1, you will need the Vortec style intake manifold.

With headers and good tuning, you will be well over 300hp.

Audie
audiec is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 09:20 AM
  #10  
TedH
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
TedH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 8,344
Received 66 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bobs77vet
i'm not sure, but two popular heads back then were the camel or double hump heads or fuellie heads and they had two different valve sizes so my guess is the more powerful one used the big valve, probalby a different cam and maybe even a different compression ratio....
That sounds about right. May have also had different carb jetting and timing settings due to the compression, cam and head differences.
TedH is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 10:13 AM
  #11  
stingr69
Le Mans Master
 
stingr69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock AR
Posts: 6,598
Received 1,039 Likes on 805 Posts

Default

The L-46 350/350 had upgraded internals for the added HP. Forged pistons, steel crank, 4 bolt main, windage tray, same heads as the 300 HP engine but the chambers were unshrouded and the valve sizes were increased, the cam was hydraulic and was the same one used in the L-82 which was sold through 1980. The carb and distributor had different calibration. A very flexible combination that was designed from the start as a HP Vette engine. Not used anywhere else.

The L-82 is a low compression version of the 350/350 with added pollution controls and heads that are less than desireable from a flow/hp and relaibillity standpoint. If you swap the heads and fix the smoggy exhaust system you can backdate your L-82 to get close to L-46 specifications. It makes for an easy to live with upgrade combo. Lots of RPM potential with great street manners and decent mileage.

-Mark.
stingr69 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 11:27 AM
  #12  
audiec
Instructor
 
audiec's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Belton Missouri
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Excellent words and I totally agree, this is an great upgrade for any pre 1987 low HP 327\350\400ci V8s...

Audie
audiec is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 12:40 PM
  #13  
gonzo14
Racer
 
gonzo14's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: West Des Moines Iowa
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a 68 300 hp numbers matching and I can attest, that the heads and block are identical to the 350 hp version. I read on this and found it to be only the cam, carb and manifold that are different, both have identical torque values (360 ft lbs)
gonzo14 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 02:26 PM
  #14  
Solid LT1
Le Mans Master
 
Solid LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Fremont CA
Posts: 5,727
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Oldguard 7
The 350-350 engine used domed pistons and a compression ratio of 11.00:1 with solid lifters

The 350-300 engine used flat top pistons and had a compression ratio of 10.25:1 with hydraulic lifters
WRONG! the 350-350 was a all forged bottom end with a BIG hydraulic cam. The bottom end is essentially the same as the LT-1. The heads had 2.02/1.6 valves but pressed in rocker studs. Intake was Q-jet. 350-350 has bottom end good for 7K RPM if you upgrade valvetrain and cylinder heards. Good motor for the "Mechanically Disinclined" who cannot adjust valve lash.
Solid LT1 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 02:32 PM
  #15  
Solid LT1
Le Mans Master
 
Solid LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Fremont CA
Posts: 5,727
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gonzo14
I have a 68 300 hp numbers matching and I can attest, that the heads and block are identical to the 350 hp version. I read on this and found it to be only the cam, carb and manifold that are different, both have identical torque values (360 ft lbs)
WRONG your 300HP engine has cast crank, cast pistons and standard connecting rods. The heads are the same casting BUT 350HP heads have a machined combustion chamber relief for flow and 2.02/1.6 valves. I wouldn't rev your 300HP motor much past 6K RPM but wouldn't have a problem running a 350HP to 6500 RPM. Also the 350HP blocks while having the same casting numers are made with high Nickle/Tin content Iron while you block is standard Iron (010/020 nubers under timing cover and other locations but, if I told you, I would probably never find a good core for my LT-1 again.)
Solid LT1 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 02:38 PM
  #16  
mpett1
Pro
 
mpett1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Harleysville pa
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does anyone have complete engine build specs for both of these motors?
mpett1 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 03:32 PM
  #17  
audiec
Instructor
 
audiec's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Belton Missouri
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have been trying to pull together the informaiton on the L46 350\350.

I have never read about the high tin block before, can this be verified?

Also have not been able to verify that the L46 186 heads had pressed in studs vs screwed in w\guide plates? And the machined combustion chamber relief, can this be verified?

I have never found the specs on the rods other than the forged "pink rods" were used. Part number?

I am also still looking for the piston part number and dome spec?

If we can verify this I will post what I have compiled...

Audie
audiec is offline  

Get notified of new replies

To 1969 350 300hp

Old 03-08-2006, 03:33 PM
  #18  
Oldguard 7
Melting Slicks
 
Oldguard 7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Solid LT1
WRONG! the 350-350 was a all forged bottom end with a BIG hydraulic cam. The bottom end is essentially the same as the LT-1. The heads had 2.02/1.6 valves but pressed in rocker studs. Intake was Q-jet. 350-350 has bottom end good for 7K RPM if you upgrade valvetrain and cylinder heards. Good motor for the "Mechanically Disinclined" who cannot adjust valve lash.
Got that message several posts before yours.....Thanx for the edumuhcation
Oldguard 7 is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 04:20 PM
  #19  
kodaclr
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
kodaclr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow, Thanks everyone. This makes for good reading. Like I stated before I am trying to get educated and everyone is helping a lot. Thanks again.

Mine is the 300hp and the previous owner made upgades not sure what but things were done for the better.
kodaclr is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 04:21 PM
  #20  
Ed Blue 03
Racer
 
Ed Blue 03's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 494
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mpett1
Does anyone have complete engine build specs for both of these motors?
73 and 74 specs, the others are also on the site: http://www.nastyz28.com/camaro/z28l82.html
Ed Blue 03 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1969 350 300hp



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 PM.