Is the L48 a good engine? Comments please...
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2005
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is the L48 a good engine? Comments please...
I have been looking for a Corvette. I found one in the local papers, it is a 76 Corvette with a 350 L48 engine and 4 speed manual. Guy says everything is stock. He wants $5500.
Here are my 2 questions. A 4 speed sounds like it should not be paired with a 350ci engine. Was this the standard back in the 70's vettes? I can't imagine how a 4 speed could handle a 350.
My second question, I did a search on the web and the only stat I found says the L48 makes 180HP. This sounds like a very low number.
How good is the L48 engine? Should I be looking for something else? I don't want to have some V6 honda beat me on the road, that would be humiliating. I am not looking to race, but I would like to know if I need to drop the hammer, the car will move.
Can the L48 be easily modified to produce extra HP?
Here are my 2 questions. A 4 speed sounds like it should not be paired with a 350ci engine. Was this the standard back in the 70's vettes? I can't imagine how a 4 speed could handle a 350.
My second question, I did a search on the web and the only stat I found says the L48 makes 180HP. This sounds like a very low number.
How good is the L48 engine? Should I be looking for something else? I don't want to have some V6 honda beat me on the road, that would be humiliating. I am not looking to race, but I would like to know if I need to drop the hammer, the car will move.
Can the L48 be easily modified to produce extra HP?
#2
Race Director
yes its a good engine, yes a 4spd is fine, and yes its a slow dog with 180 hp, this was the smog laiden years and the cars are very slow by todays standards. the engine is very buildable for more power, the price sounds reasonable if the car is in nice shape. you should drive these old cars because they may not handle and steer as you may think and it may be an un pleasant surprise to you..... and yes in stock form a v6 Honda will eat you alive in every aspect! except coolness
The following users liked this post:
John Hearon (02-12-2021)
#3
L48 = good. 190hp is correct for "smog years".
L82 = better.
4spd. can't handle a 350?!? Was your last car a Honda perhaps?
4spd. trannies have been in muscle cars, hot rods and sports cars since the beginning of time...
L82 = better.
4spd. can't handle a 350?!? Was your last car a Honda perhaps?
4spd. trannies have been in muscle cars, hot rods and sports cars since the beginning of time...
Last edited by TonySinclair; 10-04-2005 at 07:40 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by TonySinclair:
Richard Daugird (01-13-2023),
SLS7896 (10-23-2016)
#5
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2005
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TonySinclair
L48 = good. 190hp is correct for "smog years".
L82 = better.
4spd. can't handle a 350?!? Was your last car a Honda perhaps?
4spd. trannies have been in muscle cars, hot rods and sports cars since the beginning of time...
L82 = better.
4spd. can't handle a 350?!? Was your last car a Honda perhaps?
4spd. trannies have been in muscle cars, hot rods and sports cars since the beginning of time...
The 4 speed just strikes me as strange. At what speed does it redline in 4th gear? When it redlines in 4th, do you have the feeling there should be another gear??
#6
Somebody stop me if I'm wrong:
L-48 used 2 bolt main caps on the crank journals instead of 4 bolts like an L-82. Intake manifold was cast iron and not aluminum. Valves were smaller 1.98 and not 2.02. rockers had did not have guides. Pistons were not forged steel? Compression was lower.
All that said, lots of potential for cheap and I like the torque. It's been said here many times that a nice L48 is better than a crappy L82. Enjoy.
L-48 used 2 bolt main caps on the crank journals instead of 4 bolts like an L-82. Intake manifold was cast iron and not aluminum. Valves were smaller 1.98 and not 2.02. rockers had did not have guides. Pistons were not forged steel? Compression was lower.
All that said, lots of potential for cheap and I like the torque. It's been said here many times that a nice L48 is better than a crappy L82. Enjoy.
#7
Le Mans Master
It only takes some good aluminum heads, a better cam, intake and headers to make it fly
If you can get this '76 for $5500 and it is in good shape then the extra money for the performance upgrades (roughly $1400-$1800 depending on where you buy) will be well spend money.
A L82 in similar shape will be more expensive, especially with a 4speed.
Keep the original parts for whenever you want to sell the car.
If you can get this '76 for $5500 and it is in good shape then the extra money for the performance upgrades (roughly $1400-$1800 depending on where you buy) will be well spend money.
A L82 in similar shape will be more expensive, especially with a 4speed.
Keep the original parts for whenever you want to sell the car.
#8
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: 406ci SB, AFR 180 Heads - 490 HP @5,600 RPM 529 lb-ft @ 4,100 RPM
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Any Vette can be up-grade with time and money. If you like the car go get it and enjoy it. Just drive it like you stole it . In time if you want, you can take that L-48 and make it run strong. I took my L-82 to 375hp (dyno) it just took money for parts.
#9
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Coming home from Luckenbach Texas
Posts: 7,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
The small-block Chevy 350 is the most upgradeable and easily modified engine out there. Don't worry about stock performance...this is the place to come learn about how you can put some fire in that engine.
Have an knowledgeable person look at the car. You should be more worried about rust in certain key areas than the stock engine performance. It's easy to upgrade the engine, hard to fix rust...
Have an knowledgeable person look at the car. You should be more worried about rust in certain key areas than the stock engine performance. It's easy to upgrade the engine, hard to fix rust...
#10
Originally Posted by Maggs
How much quicker is a L82 than a L48 0-60? Is this a big selling point on 70's corvettes, will a L82 be much more expensive?
The 4 speed just strikes me as strange. At what speed does it redline in 4th gear? When it redlines in 4th, do you have the feeling there should be another gear??
The 4 speed just strikes me as strange. At what speed does it redline in 4th gear? When it redlines in 4th, do you have the feeling there should be another gear??
L82 would probably not be very much more expensive, but harder to find. 4 speeds are not easy to find in 70's vettes at all;
a 4 speed can handle a 427 or 454; it was the preferred transmission for muscle cars.
the l48 can be upgraded to good performance by switching heads, cams, manifold, headers, carb, etc. or you can pull the original l48, save it, and drop in a crate engine that will be more powerful than either the l48 or l82.
#11
Safety Car
In the 70s a 180 or 190 hp engine was considered pretty good.
Look at the other HP ratings for cars in the same year.
1976 Camaro Engine code
D = 250ci 105hp,
L = 350ci 165hp,
Q = 305ci 140hp
1976 Ford Mustang HP ratings
2.3L Four-Cylinder 92hp @ 5,000rpm
2.8L V-6 103hp @ 4,400rpm
5.0L V-8 139hp @ 4,000rpm
Now I guess it depends on what year Honda Accord you are talking about. I looked at the 2005 Civic specs and found the following.
Engine output increases to 244 horsepower for the 3.0-liter VTEC V6 and 166 horsepower for the 2.4-liter i-VTEC ...
So a newer Honda could probably give that vette a good run.
Of course if you were to race a 1976 Honda Civic, it would be a different story.
I found that horsepower rating also.
Power 70 bhp @ 5500 rpm
And how did apply at that power???
with a 5 speed of course. (TRANSMISSION 5 Speed )
kdf
Look at the other HP ratings for cars in the same year.
1976 Camaro Engine code
D = 250ci 105hp,
L = 350ci 165hp,
Q = 305ci 140hp
1976 Ford Mustang HP ratings
2.3L Four-Cylinder 92hp @ 5,000rpm
2.8L V-6 103hp @ 4,400rpm
5.0L V-8 139hp @ 4,000rpm
Now I guess it depends on what year Honda Accord you are talking about. I looked at the 2005 Civic specs and found the following.
Engine output increases to 244 horsepower for the 3.0-liter VTEC V6 and 166 horsepower for the 2.4-liter i-VTEC ...
So a newer Honda could probably give that vette a good run.
Of course if you were to race a 1976 Honda Civic, it would be a different story.
I found that horsepower rating also.
Power 70 bhp @ 5500 rpm
And how did apply at that power???
with a 5 speed of course. (TRANSMISSION 5 Speed )
kdf
#13
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: 406ci SB, AFR 180 Heads - 490 HP @5,600 RPM 529 lb-ft @ 4,100 RPM
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by cosmicvette
"Fruit Flies" there always buzzing around something sweet
Vette's have more torque in their wheel nuts.
#14
Melting Slicks
Okay, I'll speak in pretty general terms here. L82 4 speed cars are usually rarer and harder to find. Case in point, only about 1 in 9 1976 Vettes came with an L82 engine. Only 1 in 5 came with a 4 speed. Finding a 1976 L82 four speed that hasn't been abused is even rarer.
Yes, the L82 and L48 were pretty much dogs by todays standards, but keep in mind that you can change the rear gears to a lower ratio to give you a little more quickness.
I've owned 4 C4 cars or which 2 were L 48s and 1 was an L82. The other??? An '82 200hp crossfire.
Yes, the L82 and L48 were pretty much dogs by todays standards, but keep in mind that you can change the rear gears to a lower ratio to give you a little more quickness.
I've owned 4 C4 cars or which 2 were L 48s and 1 was an L82. The other??? An '82 200hp crossfire.
#15
Melting Slicks
I believe you heard plenty about the L-48 and the above advice is pretty much on the money. One thing that wasn't mentioned is that the corvette is not a light car, somewhere around 3500 lbs. Many aftermarket engines rate their hp at the crank with no accessories with a free flowing exhaust. The L-48 would be rated much higher under these conditions.
The good news is that L-48 still has decent torque, problem is it peters out rather quickly. If all you have is the $5500 for the car, then don't expect it to compete with today's engines in lighter cars. I would figure adding $1500 for some mods if you want to stay up with the honda's. Even that is tough if the ricers are spraying their engine.
The big advantage of the C3 is its looks. You would be hard pressed to find a car with the style of a C3 for that amount of money.
The good news is that L-48 still has decent torque, problem is it peters out rather quickly. If all you have is the $5500 for the car, then don't expect it to compete with today's engines in lighter cars. I would figure adding $1500 for some mods if you want to stay up with the honda's. Even that is tough if the ricers are spraying their engine.
The big advantage of the C3 is its looks. You would be hard pressed to find a car with the style of a C3 for that amount of money.
The following users liked this post:
hdeyong (01-17-2023)
#16
Originally Posted by Maggs
How much quicker is a L82 than a L48 0-60? Is this a big selling point on 70's corvettes, will a L82 be much more expensive?
The 4 speed just strikes me as strange. At what speed does it redline in 4th gear? When it redlines in 4th, do you have the feeling there should be another gear??
The 4 speed just strikes me as strange. At what speed does it redline in 4th gear? When it redlines in 4th, do you have the feeling there should be another gear??
BTW:I have a Muncie 4 speed (M-22) behind the 502 69....
Last edited by rihwoods; 10-04-2005 at 11:28 PM.
#17
I am not sure what 4 spds were available in 76, I was disappointed a few months ago to find my 78 4spd was not a Muncie...but rather a Saginaw. Not sure what this means with mild mods but at some point I was afraid that the Saginaw couldn't get the job done and I Sh*t canned it so I wouldn't have to worry about.
Nothing worse than blowin up when ur tryin to show off
Nothing worse than blowin up when ur tryin to show off
#18
Originally Posted by molchaser
I am not sure what 4 spds were available in 76, I was disappointed a few months ago to find my 78 4spd was not a Muncie...but rather a Saginaw. Not sure what this means with mild mods but at some point I was afraid that the Saginaw couldn't get the job done and I Sh*t canned it so I wouldn't have to worry about.
Nothing worse than blowin up when ur tryin to show off
Nothing worse than blowin up when ur tryin to show off
Rich
#19
Melting Slicks
To give you an idea how rare the 4 speeds are for 1978, only about 1 in 25 came with the 4 speed.
A '78 L82 4 speed has got to be pretty damn rare. That's why if you find a 78 pace car with this combo, you pay some tall bucks to buy it.
A '78 L82 4 speed has got to be pretty damn rare. That's why if you find a 78 pace car with this combo, you pay some tall bucks to buy it.
#20
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by TexasMadMan
To give you an idea how rare the 4 speeds are for 1978, only about 1 in 25 came with the 4 speed.
A '78 L82 4 speed has got to be pretty damn rare. That's why if you find a 78 pace car with this combo, you pay some tall bucks to buy it.
A '78 L82 4 speed has got to be pretty damn rare. That's why if you find a 78 pace car with this combo, you pay some tall bucks to buy it.
Seriously, The L-82 has an outstanding bottom end (almost identical to the LT-1, which it replaced), a good cam (same as in the L46 350/350 option of the early 70s), and is hobbled by bad heads, a low compression ratio (9.0:1), and after 74, a catalytic converter and 2-1-2 exhaust system.
If you're gonna tear it up anyway, I wouldn't bother trying to find an L-82, I'd just work the L-48 (a 2-bolt main block will handle 400hp in a street car) or get a block from a yard if you want a 4-bolt. Chevy did make millions of them....
Good luck.